Cartoons, -> Health Care Cartoons
ACA cartoons image illustration picture
ACA

Description:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius; Obamacare; Affordable Care Act; Commerce Clause; health insurance; healthcare; individual mandate; minimum coverage; pre-existing conditions; premiums; Chief Justice Roberts.

Select Usage (details) :



Obamacare cartoons image illustration picture
Obamacare

Description:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius; Affordable Care Act; ACA; Taxation Clause; Congress authority to levy taxes; health insurance; healthcare; individual mandate; minimum coverage; pre-existing conditions; premiums.

Select Usage (details) :



Affordable Care Act cartoons image illustration picture
Affordable Care Act

Description:
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius; Obamacare; Medicaid expansion; Spending Clause; Congress spending power; Medicaid funding; health insurance; healthcare; individual mandate; pre-existing conditions; premiums.

Select Usage (details) :



apparent agency vicarious liability cartoons image illustration picture
apparent agency vicarious liability

Description:
Roessler v. Novak; a principal may be held liable for the acts of an agent if the principal permits the appearance of authority in the agent. Independent contractor.

Select Usage (details) :



National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act cartoons image illustration picture
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act

Description:
Pafford v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs. Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, a plaintiff may demonstrate causation only by proving that a vaccine was both a but-for cause and a substantial factor in causing her injury.

Select Usage (details) :



The Medical Devise Amendments Prempt State Law cartoons image illustration picture
The Medical Devise Amendments Prempt State Law

Description:
Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.; The Medical Device Amendments preempt state requirements that are different from, or in addition to, any requirements applicable to a medical device under federal law; preemption.

Select Usage (details) :



Juries May Impose Higher Warning Standards than the FDA cartoons image illustration picture
Juries May Impose Higher Warning Standards than the FDA

Description:
Wyeth v. Levine; Where it is not impossible for a drug manufacturer to comply with both state and federal law, common law claims do not stand as an obstacle to the accomplishment of Congress's purposes in the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

Select Usage (details) :



Hospital Liability for Discharging Unstable Patients cartoons image illustration picture
Hospital Liability for Discharging Unstable Patients

Description:
Lewellen v. Schneck Medical Center; A hospital must provide appropriate medical screening within emergency department; the patient may not be discharged until he has received stabilizing treatment or has been appropriately transferred.

Select Usage (details) :



Student Acting Under Doctor Authority Does Not Commit Battery cartoons image illustration picture
Student Acting Under Doctor Authority Does Not Commit Battery

Description:
Mullins v. Parkview Hospital, Inc; In order to state a claim for battery, the plaintiff must show that the defendant acted intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the plaintiff.

Select Usage (details) :



Res Ipsa Loquitur in Med Mal cartoons image illustration picture
Res Ipsa Loquitur in Med Mal

Description:
Sides v. St. Anthony's Medical Center. A plaintiff in a medical malpractice case can use res ipsa loquitur theory where the plaintiff offers a medical expert's opinion that the injury would not have occurred in the absence of negligence by the defendant.

Select Usage (details) :



Newman v. Sathyavaglswaran cartoons image illustration picture
Newman v. Sathyavaglswaran

Description:
Property interests of next of kin in bodies of their family members are firmly entrenched, and state may not alter those interests via exceptions to general rule that lack firm basis in traditional property principles. Due process.

Select Usage (details) :



Jacobson v. Massachusetts cartoons image illustration picture
Jacobson v. Massachusetts

Description:
Public health laws are within police powers of states, and state is given broad discretion in making those laws.

Select Usage (details) :



State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. McDonagh cartoons image illustration picture
State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. McDonagh

Description:
Appropriate standard of care is degree of skill and learning used by members of profession in similar circumstances.

Select Usage (details) :



Fairfax Nursing Home, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Services cartoons image illustration picture
Fairfax Nursing Home, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Services

Description:
When imposing sanctions for deficient care, situation of all similar patients at facility must be considered, not just status of individual patient or patients. Administative law judge; civil penalty.

Select Usage (details) :



Campbell v. Delbridge cartoons image illustration picture
Campbell v. Delbridge

Description:
Emotional distress; issues in medical malpractice case that are only peripheral to medical decisions do not require expert testimony.

Select Usage (details) :



Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc.

Description:
Learned intermediary doctrine. Prescription drug manufacturers that market directly to consumers are subject to failure-to-warn claims by consumers if advertising fails to provide adequate warning of products dangerous propensities.

Select Usage (details) :



Hardi v. Mezzanotte cartoons image illustration picture
Hardi v. Mezzanotte

Description:
Under discovery rule, medical malpractice claim does not accrue until patient has some knowledge of (1 )injury, (2) the injury's cause in fact, and (3) evidence of wrongdoing on part of person responsible. ocurrence rule.

Select Usage (details) :



Doe v. Medlantic Health Care Group, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Doe v. Medlantic Health Care Group, Inc.

Description:
Tort of breach of confidential relationship consists of unconsented, unprivileged disclosure to third party of nonpublic information learned within confidential relationship.

Select Usage (details) :



Simmons v. Tuomey Regional Medical Center cartoons image illustration picture
Simmons v. Tuomey Regional Medical Center

Description:
Hospital owes its emergency room patients nondelegable duty to render competent services.

Select Usage (details) :



Johnson v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Johnson v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc.

Description:
Expert testimony is not necessary in medical malpractice case to show standard of care or deviations from that, if common knowledge of laypersons would enable jury to determine applicable standard of care and whether breach caused injury.

Select Usage (details) :



Douglass v. Salem Community Hospital cartoons image illustration picture
Douglass v. Salem Community Hospital

Description:
Duty to act affirmatively to aid or protect another exists when there is a special relationship between parties that justifies imposing such duty.

Select Usage (details) :



Williams v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Williams v. United States

Description:
State anti-discrimination laws and regulations do not create cause of action against hospital that refuses to provide care for racial reasons.

Select Usage (details) :



Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran cartoons image illustration picture
Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran

Description:
ERISA does not preempt state insurance regulatory scheme that does not provide new cause of action under state law and that does not authorize new form of ultimate relief. HMO.

Select Usage (details) :



DiFelice v. Aetna U.S. Health care cartoons image illustration picture
DiFelice v. Aetna U.S. Health care

Description:
Claims that are not related to provision or denial of benefit under policy are not preempted by ERISA.

Select Usage (details) :



Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East cartoons image illustration picture
Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East

Description:
ERISA requires disclosure to plan beneficiaries if they ask for information, if disclosure of information would protect beneficiaries from misinformed decisions or if harm would result from failure to disclose material information.

Select Usage (details) :



Westside Mothers v. Haveman cartoons image illustration picture
Westside Mothers v. Haveman

Description:
Medicaid is not merely contract, it is federal law that may be enforced by private right of action brought under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. spending power; supreme law of land.

Select Usage (details) :



Mahan v. Avera St. Luke's cartoons image illustration picture
Mahan v. Avera St. Luke's

Description:
Medical staff of a hospital has no authority over any corporate decisions, unless such authority is explicitly granted in corporate bylaws.

Select Usage (details) :



N.L.R.B. v. Kentucky River Community Care cartoons image illustration picture
N.L.R.B. v. Kentucky River Community Care

Description:
Employee is supervisor if he or she exercises independent professional judgment, including judgment used in directing less-skilled employees to deliver services. Bargaining unit.

Select Usage (details) :



Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital v. Spitzer cartoons image illustration picture
Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital v. Spitzer

Description:
In order to obtain judicial approval of a sale of all or substantially all of non-profit corporation assets, the board must show that consideration and terms of transaction are fair and that purposes of corporation will be promoted.

Select Usage (details) :



IHC Health Plans, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue cartoons image illustration picture
IHC Health Plans, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Description:
Organization will not be considered charitable unless it is operated primarily to serve public rather than private interest.

Select Usage (details) :



IHC Health Plans, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue cartoons image illustration picture
IHC Health Plans, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Description:
Organization that is not itself tax-exempt may become tax-exempt if it operates solely to provide goods or services to exempt organizations that are essential to the operation of that exempt organization.

Select Usage (details) :



United States ex rel. Mikes v. Straus cartoons image illustration picture
United States ex rel. Mikes v. Straus

Description:
Claim is legally false for purposes of False Claims Act only when party certifies compliance with statute or regulation as condition to governmental payment. Act qui tam action.

Select Usage (details) :



Prato-Morrison v. Doe cartoons image illustration picture
Prato-Morrison v. Doe

Description:
Business records exception. Person may not bring an action to establish parentage unless that person can produce evidence that he or she is genetic parent of child.

Select Usage (details) :



Guardianship of J.D.S. cartoons image illustration picture
Guardianship of J.D.S.

Description:
Guardian ad litem. Unborn child is not person within meaning of statutes authorizing appointment of guardian over person. Plenary.

Select Usage (details) :



Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute cartoons image illustration picture
Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute

Description:
Donor has no property rights in body tissue and genetic matter donated for purposes of research. Unjust enrichment.

Select Usage (details) :



Conservatorship of Wendland cartoons image illustration picture
Conservatorship of Wendland

Description:
Decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment must be supported by clear and convincing evidence that patient either wished to refuse treatment or that withdrawal would be in best interest of patient. Parens patriae.

Select Usage (details) :



Guardianship of Schiavo cartoons image illustration picture
Guardianship of Schiavo

Description:
Advance directive; living will. In absence of instructions, court may make decision on whether life support should be withdrawn, based on clear and convincing evidence of what patient would want.

Select Usage (details) :



Miller v. HCA cartoons image illustration picture
Miller v. HCA

Description:
Physician does not commit legal wrong when he provides treatment to minor without parental consent under emergent circumstances,if death is likely to result immediately upon failure to perform treatment.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative

Description:
Medical necessity is not defense available under Controlled Substances Act to distributors and manufacturers of marijuana.

Select Usage (details) :



Grimes  v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.

Description:
Relationship between researchers and human subjects in nontherapeutic research projects may create special duties, breach of which may be basis for negligence action.

Select Usage (details) :



Medical Evidence Establishing Standard Of Care cartoons image illustration picture
Medical Evidence Establishing Standard Of Care

Description:
Berry v. Cardiology Consultants, P.A.; scientific evidence is relevant if it is probative of an issue in the case, such as the standard of care; Learned Treatise Rule; admissability of expert testimony.

Select Usage (details) :



No Duty to Provide Medical Treatment cartoons image illustration picture
No Duty to Provide Medical Treatment

Description:
Esqueval v. Watters; a sonogram technician owes no legal duty to provide medical treatment, diagnosis, or advice because no duty exists outside the physician-patient relationship.

Select Usage (details) :



Doctor Negligence Possible Outside Physician Patient Relationship cartoons image illustration picture
Doctor Negligence Possible Outside Physician Patient Relationship

Description:
Millard v. Corrado; physician duty of due care to a non-patient if the physician's allegedly negligent acts or omissions do not involve medical science, and public policy favors existence of a duty or harm is particularly foreseeable; negligence action.

Select Usage (details) :



Physicians Guarantees Create Common Law Liability for Breach of Warranty cartoons image illustration picture
Physicians Guarantees Create Common Law Liability for Breach of Warranty

Description:
Mills v. Pate; a negligence action may not be recast as a contractual claim so as to avoid statutory requirements governing healthcare liability claims.

Select Usage (details) :



Unauthorized Disclosure of Patient Medical Records cartoons image illustration picture
Unauthorized Disclosure of Patient Medical Records

Description:
Herman v. Kratche; honest mistake by healthcare provider is no defense to claim for unauthorized disclosure of confidential medical records if fiduciary relationship breached, causing patient damages. invasion of privacy; right of privacy.

Select Usage (details) :



HIPAA Requirements Establish Standard of Care cartoons image illustration picture
HIPAA Requirements Establish Standard of Care

Description:
Acosta v. Byrum et al.; HIPAA compliance violations may give rise to civil liability for negligence although HIPAA confers no private right of action, but create SOC for a negligence claim; negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Select Usage (details) :



Algorithms Establishing General Physician Guidelines are Admissible cartoons image illustration picture
Algorithms Establishing General Physician Guidelines are Admissible

Description:
Hinlicky v. Dreyfuss; hearsay evidence is admissible in negligence cases when used as demonstrative evidence to assist the jury in understanding the medical decision-making of a treating physician.

Select Usage (details) :



Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress cartoons image illustration picture
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress

Description:
Strasel v. Seven Hills Ob-Gyn Assoc., Inc.; damages for her fear of birth defects in unborn child gives a cause of action for the negligent infliction of serious emotional distress if plaintiff-bystander reasonably appreciated the peril that took place.

Select Usage (details) :



Off Label Use of Prescription Drugs cartoons image illustration picture
Off Label Use of Prescription Drugs

Description:
Richardson v. Miller; drug's labeling or PDR reference of approved uses admissable regarding whether the drug appropriate if introduced with other expert evidence on the standard of care; presented an unacceptable risk to the patient.

Select Usage (details) :



Question of Fact for the Jury cartoons image illustration picture
Question of Fact for the Jury

Description:
Robins v. Garg; differing interpretations of undisputed facts suffice to create a question of fact for the jury to establish causation in a wrongful death action; but-for cause causation; malpractice; proximate cause.

Select Usage (details) :



Grimm v. Summit County Children Servs. Bd. cartoons image illustration picture
Grimm v. Summit County Children Servs. Bd.

Description:
violation of a statutory obligation to report child abuse constitutes negligence per se by hospital; vicariously liable for negligence of employees; negligence per se; respondeat superior; vicarious liability.

Select Usage (details) :



Respondeat Superior cartoons image illustration picture
Respondeat Superior

Description:
Scott v. SSM Healthcare St. Louis; hospitals deemed to "control" physicians even though they cannot dictate the treatment given to patients; independent contractor; agent; principal; vicarious liability.

Select Usage (details) :



Apparent Agency cartoons image illustration picture
Apparent Agency

Description:
Burless v. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc.; hospital liable for physician's negligence if hospital acted or failed to act so reasonable person believed physician was an agent of hospital and patient relied on apparent agency; apparent agent.

Select Usage (details) :



Hospital Duty of Care to Patients cartoons image illustration picture
Hospital Duty of Care to Patients

Description:
Carter v. Hucks-Folliss; a hospital should consider a doctor's board certification status when granting hospital privileges for physician conducting surgery.

Select Usage (details) :



Hospital Negligence for Giving Doctor Credentials cartoons image illustration picture
Hospital Negligence for Giving Doctor Credentials

Description:
Larson v. Wasemiller; hospitals may be liable for negligently giving credentials to physicians; a common-law cause of action for negligent credentialing does exist, and is not precluded by the peer-review statute.

Select Usage (details) :



Negligent Misrepresentation by Hospital Regarding Physician cartoons image illustration picture
Negligent Misrepresentation by Hospital Regarding Physician

Description:
Kadlec Med. Ctr. v. Lakeview Anesthesia Assoc.; hospitals may face liability for failing to disclose a former anesthesiologist's suspected drug abuse.

Select Usage (details) :



HMO Liability for Negligent Selection of Providers cartoons image illustration picture
HMO Liability for Negligent Selection of Providers

Description:
Pagarigan v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California, Inc.; an HMO that contracts out coverage decisions and the responsibility for patient care for capitation fee owes enrollees a duty of due care when choosing providers and in making contracts.

Select Usage (details) :



HMO Doctor Compensation Contract cartoons image illustration picture
HMO Doctor Compensation Contract

Description:
Brannan v. Northwest Permanente, P.C.; an HMO physician's compensation history is irrelevant to a patient's negligence case; a defendant's motive for acting is irrelevant to whether he breached the standard of care in malpractice lawsuit.

Select Usage (details) :



ERISA Preemption cartoons image illustration picture
ERISA Preemption

Description:
Retail Industry Leaders Association v. Fiedler; ERISA preempts state laws requiring employers to pay health insurance costs; or if directly regulates or effectively mandates some part of structure or administration of employers' ERISA plans.

Select Usage (details) :



ERISA Preempts All State Actions For Denial Of Benefits cartoons image illustration picture
ERISA Preempts All State Actions For Denial Of Benefits

Description:
Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila; All actions brought for the denial of benefits by an ERISA-regulated benefit plan fall within the scope of, and are preempted by, ERISA.

Select Usage (details) :



Administrative Discretion Under the Medicare Act cartoons image illustration picture
Administrative Discretion Under the Medicare Act

Description:
Bellevue Hospital Center v. Leavitt; when assessing the propriety of agency action or regulation, only if there is silence or ambiguity on an issue, the agency has discretion as to how it implements a statute.

Select Usage (details) :



Must Follow Federal Rules if Take Federal Benefits cartoons image illustration picture
Must Follow Federal Rules if Take Federal Benefits

Description:
Lankford v. Sherman; Medicaid is a voluntary federal-state program, so a state that elects to participate in the program is bound by the requirements of federal law and regulations.

Select Usage (details) :



Supervisory Employees under Union Labor Collective Bargaining Agreement cartoons image illustration picture
Supervisory Employees under Union Labor Collective Bargaining Agreement

Description:
Oakwood Healthcare, Inc.; supervisory employees use independent judgment in performing their jobs; National Labor Relations Act NLRA; National Labor Relations Board NLRB.

Select Usage (details) :



Selection of Hospitals cartoons image illustration picture
Selection of Hospitals

Description:
Federal Trade Commission v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.; a hospital merger did not deprive patients of practicable healthcare alternatives or choices.

Select Usage (details) :



Market Leverage from Merger cartoons image illustration picture
Market Leverage from Merger

Description:
In the Matter of Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Corp.; a hospital failed to establish non-merger justifications for price hikes; substantially inflating prices violates federal antitrust law; Clayton Act; divestiture.

Select Usage (details) :



Sperm Donor Agreement Must Be in Writing cartoons image illustration picture
Sperm Donor Agreement Must Be in Writing

Description:
In the Interest of K.M.H.; requiring written agreements to establish sperm donor paternity does not violate equal protection or due process.

Select Usage (details) :



Child Endangerment Statute Does Not Protect Unborn Children cartoons image illustration picture
Child Endangerment Statute Does Not Protect Unborn Children

Description:
State v. Wade; in absence of specific legislative direction, illegal drug use by a pregnant mother does not constitute child endangerment.

Select Usage (details) :