Cartoons, -> Contract Cartoons
The statute of frauds cartoons image illustration picture
The statute of frauds

Description:
Cloud Corp. v. Hasbro, Inc.; the statute of frauds does not require that a contract itself be in writing, only that there is adequate documentary evidence of its existence and its essential terms.

Select Usage (details) :



covenant not to compete cartoons image illustration picture
covenant not to compete

Description:
Lake Land Employment Group of Akron v. Columber; no new consideration; noncompete agreement; continued employment of an at-will employee is sufficient consideration to support an agreement not to compete; employment at will.

Select Usage (details) :



Arbitration Agreement cartoons image illustration picture
Arbitration Agreement

Description:
Washington Mutual Finance Group v. Bailey; illiteracy does not make an arbitration agreement unconscionable.

Select Usage (details) :



extrinsic evidence cartoons image illustration picture
extrinsic evidence

Description:
Interform Co. v. Mitchell; outside evidence; extrinsic evidence will be admitted to show the true intent of the parties to a contract; complete and exclusive statement of the agreement; bill of lading.

Select Usage (details) :



Nelson v. Elway cartoons image illustration picture
Nelson v. Elway

Description:
Merger clauses bar extrinsic evidence integration clauses preclude the introduction of extrinsic evidence to prove the existence of prior agreements. Integration clause.

Select Usage (details) :



Jungmann & Co., Inc. v. Atterbury Brothers, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Jungmann & Co., Inc. v. Atterbury Brothers, Inc.

Description:
All contractual conditions must be performed before bringing an action for breach a party may not recover on a contract unless that party can show that it has performed all of the conditions required of it. condition precedent condition subsequent.

Select Usage (details) :



Rouse v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Rouse v. United States

Description:
Assumption of another s obligation is also assumption of that person s rights a party who assumes the obligation of another is entitled to raise the same defenses as would have been available to the person whose obligation is assumed.

Select Usage (details) :



Slattery v. Wells Fargo Armored Service Corp. cartoons image illustration picture
Slattery v. Wells Fargo Armored Service Corp.

Description:
Pre-existing duty rule; The performance of an existing duty does not amount to the consideration necessary to form a contract.

Select Usage (details) :



McMahon Food Corp. v. Burger Dairy Co. cartoons image illustration picture
McMahon Food Corp. v. Burger Dairy Co.

Description:
An accord and satisfaction requires good faith and is a contractual method of discharging a debt; the accord is the agreement; satisfaction is the execution of the agreement.

Select Usage (details) :



In re the Marriage of Witten cartoons image illustration picture
In re the Marriage of Witten

Description:
Divorcing couples must agree on the use of frozen embryos; agreements entered into at the time of in vitro fertilization are enforceable.

Select Usage (details) :



T.F. v. B.L. cartoons image illustration picture
T.F. v. B.L.

Description:
Same-sex parents duty to provide child support; gay rights; no parenthood by contract; agreements attempting to create parental relationships are unenforceable as against public policy.

Select Usage (details) :



Coppola Enterprises, Inc. v. Alfone cartoons image illustration picture
Coppola Enterprises, Inc. v. Alfone

Description:
Breach of real estate contract for sale of land or building; breachor cannot gain from breach; breachor becomes trustee for original vendee.

Select Usage (details) :



Egerer v. CSR West, LLC cartoons image illustration picture
Egerer v. CSR West, LLC

Description:
hypothetical cover-- buyer recovers from the seller the difference between the contract price and what he would have had to pay for substitute goods if he had bought them at market price at the time of breach; UCC 2-713.

Select Usage (details) :



Valentine v. General American Credit, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Valentine v. General American Credit, Inc.

Description:
Mental distress damages not recoverable by person discharged in breach of an employment agreement; mental anguish damage.

Select Usage (details) :



Kutzin v. Pirnie cartoons image illustration picture
Kutzin v. Pirnie

Description:
The law abhors forfeitures; Restatement Second of Contracts 374(1); holding all or part of a deposit as a penalty rather than as compensation for injury; buyer is entitled to restitution.

Select Usage (details) :



Mayol v. Weiner Companies, Ltd. cartoons image illustration picture
Mayol v. Weiner Companies, Ltd.

Description:
Objective meaning of contract terms controls; if misunderstanding regarding contractual terms, meaning applied is that of person less at fault for the misunderstanding.

Select Usage (details) :



Foxco Industries, Ltd. v. Fabric World, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Foxco Industries, Ltd. v. Fabric World, Inc.

Description:
Trade group standards are admissible to clarify contracts; the uniform commercial code UCC makes admissible evidence of course of dealing, usage of trade and course of performance to explain or supplement the terms of any writing.

Select Usage (details) :



Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital cartoons image illustration picture
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital

Description:
Wrongful termination; at-will employment doctrine states an employee may be terminated for cause, or even without cause, but not for bad cause.

Select Usage (details) :



Chateau Des Charmes Wines Ltd. v. Sabate USA Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Chateau Des Charmes Wines Ltd. v. Sabate USA Inc.

Description:
Statements on international shipping invoices do not alter the original agreement; the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods UNCCISG.

Select Usage (details) :



Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp. cartoons image illustration picture
Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.

Description:
Online agreements must be obvious to user; a consumer's clicking on a download button does not communicate assent to contractual terms if offer did not make clear to the consumer that clicking on download button would signify assent.

Select Usage (details) :



Register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.

Description:
internet contracts do not all require clicking on I Agree; silence or inaction may operate as acceptance of contract terms when an offeree takes the benefit of offered services with a reasonable opportunity to reject.

Select Usage (details) :



Donovan v. RRL Corp. cartoons image illustration picture
Donovan v. RRL Corp.

Description:
Mistakenly advertised prices may not be binding on seller; a mistake of fact is a mistake, not caused by neglect of a legal duty on part of the person making the mistake, consisting of an unconscious ignorance or forgetfulness of material fact.

Select Usage (details) :



Alamance County Board of Education v. Bobby Murray Chevrolet, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Alamance County Board of Education v. Bobby Murray Chevrolet, Inc.

Description:
Doctrine of commercial impracticability is a high standard; performance is not excused unless seller has employed all due measures to assure himself that his source of supply will not fail.

Select Usage (details) :



Scarpitti v. Weborg cartoons image illustration picture
Scarpitti v. Weborg

Description:
Restrictive covenants benefit homeowners as third party beneficiaries.

Select Usage (details) :



Clapp v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Clapp v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc.

Description:
Contractual rights may be assigned, but not contract obligations; exception (1) materially change duties of other party, (2) materially increase burden or risk imposed or (3) materially impair that party's chances of obtaining return performance.

Select Usage (details) :



Koch v. Construction Technology, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Koch v. Construction Technology, Inc.

Description:
Conditions precedent are not favored in contract law so require clear language; pay when paid clauses.

Select Usage (details) :



Oral Promise as Contract Basis cartoons image illustration picture
Oral Promise as Contract Basis

Description:
Hawkins v. McGee; words that constitute a promise may be the basis of a contract.

Select Usage (details) :



Bayliner Marine Corp. v. Crow cartoons image illustration picture
Bayliner Marine Corp. v. Crow

Description:
Statements that do not relate to the particular item purchased, or that merely commend the quality of goods, do not create express warranties.

Select Usage (details) :



Punitive Damages in Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Punitive Damages in Contract

Description:
White v. Benkowski; Punitive damages may not be recovered for breach of contract nominal damages: pecuiniary damages punitive damages.

Select Usage (details) :



Noncompete Agreement cartoons image illustration picture
Noncompete Agreement

Description:
Lake Land Employment Group of Akron, LLC v. Columber; continuation of at-will employment relationship is sufficient consideration for the employee's agreement.

Select Usage (details) :



New Contract Terms in Packaging cartoons image illustration picture
New Contract Terms in Packaging

Description:
Hill v. Gateway 2000, Inc.; terms contained inside a package may become part of the contract; shrink wrap agreement; click wrap.

Select Usage (details) :



The Statute of Frauds cartoons image illustration picture
The Statute of Frauds

Description:
C.R. Klewin, Inc. v. Flagship Properties, Inc.; oral contract with indefinite duration is outside of the Statute of Frauds.

Select Usage (details) :



Statute of Frauds for Sale of Real Property cartoons image illustration picture
Statute of Frauds for Sale of Real Property

Description:
Richard v. Richard; oral contract to convey real estate, part performance, possession of the property, making improvements, payment of a substantial part of the purchase price, done in reliance on the agreement.

Select Usage (details) :



Written Confirmation of Oral Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Written Confirmation of Oral Contract

Description:
St. Ansgar Mills, Inc. v. Streit; question of fact of the jury as to reasonableness of time for receipt of written confirmation.

Select Usage (details) :



Central Ceilings, Inc. v. National Amusements, Inc cartoons image illustration picture
Central Ceilings, Inc. v. National Amusements, Inc

Description:
Novation; a promise to pay a debt owed by another is not within the Statute of Frauds if the leading object of the promise is to confer some benefit on the promisor.

Select Usage (details) :



Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.

Description:
Extrinsic evidence to interpret a contract or add terms may not be considered if the agreement on its face is reasonably susceptible of only one meaning.

Select Usage (details) :



Extrinsic Evidence on Parties Intent cartoons image illustration picture
Extrinsic Evidence on Parties Intent

Description:
Trident Center v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co; parties intent controls over the written word.

Select Usage (details) :



Parole Evidence cartoons image illustration picture
Parole Evidence

Description:
Colfax Envelope Corp. v. Local No. 458-3M; rescission allowed based on mutual misunderstanding, not ambiguous term.

Select Usage (details) :



Warranty of Merchantability cartoons image illustration picture
Warranty of Merchantability

Description:
Koken v. Black & Veatch Construction, Inc.; breach of reasonable expectations of an ordinary user or consumer; objective standard.

Select Usage (details) :



Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose cartoons image illustration picture
Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose

Description:
Lewis v. Mobil Oil Corporation; buyer relies on the seller expertise in supplying the proper product.

Select Usage (details) :



Warranty Disclaimers cartoons image illustration picture
Warranty Disclaimers

Description:
South Carolina Electric and Gas Co. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.; buyers must have notice of warranty disclaimers.

Select Usage (details) :



Actual Damages for Contract Breach cartoons image illustration picture
Actual Damages for Contract Breach

Description:
Doe v. Great Expectations; contract that violates statutory requirements results in actual damage award.

Select Usage (details) :



Consumer Class Action Lawsuits cartoons image illustration picture
Consumer Class Action Lawsuits

Description:
Scott v. Cingular Wireless; consumer protection laws; procedural unconscionability, substantive unconscionability, unconscionable.

Select Usage (details) :



Surrogacy Contracts cartoons image illustration picture
Surrogacy Contracts

Description:
In the Matter of Baby M; surrogate mother agreements; illegal and invalid if involve the payment of money to a woman who irrevocably agrees to bear child and turn it over to another party.

Select Usage (details) :



Equitable Remedy and Specific Performance cartoons image illustration picture
Equitable Remedy and Specific Performance

Description:
Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz; uniqueness of goods depends on value to purchaser; subjective standard; not an objective standard.

Select Usage (details) :



Specific Performance cartoons image illustration picture
Specific Performance

Description:
Morris v. Sparrow; equity will grant specific performance of a contract for the sale of chattels if there are special and peculiar reasons money damages are inadequate.

Select Usage (details) :



Third Party Beneficiary of a Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Third Party Beneficiary of a Contract

Description:
Rathke v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc.; the required intent to benefit that third-party may be manifested by a promise to render performance directly to the third-party.

Select Usage (details) :



Third Party Beneficiaries cartoons image illustration picture
Third Party Beneficiaries

Description:
Verni v. Cleveland Chiropractic College; strong presumption contract executed for sole benefit of the parties; terms must directly and clearly express the intent to benefit the third-party; additur.

Select Usage (details) :



Assignee Rights Same As Assignor cartoons image illustration picture
Assignee Rights Same As Assignor

Description:
Delacy Investments, Inc. v. Thurman & Re/Max Real Estate Guide, Inc.

Select Usage (details) :



Gratuitous Promises Unenforceable cartoons image illustration picture
Gratuitous Promises Unenforceable

Description:
Jara v. Suprema Meats, Inc.; without bargained-for exchange, even written agreement unenforceable ; bilateral contract; lack of consideration.

Select Usage (details) :



Unilateral Contract Sufficient Consideration cartoons image illustration picture
Unilateral Contract Sufficient Consideration

Description:
Browning v. Johnson; detriment suffered by the promisee at promisor request, and as the price for the promise, is sufficient consideration.

Select Usage (details) :



Oral Promise to Make a Gift cartoons image illustration picture
Oral Promise to Make a Gift

Description:
Congregation Kadimah Toras-Moshe v. DeLeo; detrimental reliance or consideration makes enforceable; promisee must act in reliance or unenforceable.

Select Usage (details) :



Promissory Estoppel cartoons image illustration picture
Promissory Estoppel

Description:
Blinn v. Beatrice Community Hospital and Health Center, Inc.; promisee reliance on the promise must be reasonable and foreseeable, even if the promisor did not intend to be bound; detrimental reliance; unilateral contract.

Select Usage (details) :



Statute of Frauds cartoons image illustration picture
Statute of Frauds

Description:
Professional Bull Riders, Inc. v. AutoZone, Inc.; contracts must be in writing if technically CANNOT be performed in one year.

Select Usage (details) :



Statute of Frauds if Part Performance cartoons image illustration picture
Statute of Frauds if Part Performance

Description:
Sullivan v. Porter; part performance doctrine gives specific performance if induced by the other party misrepresentations, which may include acquiescence or silence.

Select Usage (details) :



Damages: Expectancy, Reliance, Restitution cartoons image illustration picture
Damages: Expectancy, Reliance, Restitution

Description:
Glendale Federal Bank, FSB v. United States; if a reasonable probability of damages can be clearly established, uncertainty as to the amount will not preclude recovery, and the court duty is to make a fair and reasonable approximation.

Select Usage (details) :



Implied-In-Fact Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Implied-In-Fact Contract

Description:
Wrench, LLC v. Taco Bell Corp.; conversion; misappropriation; unfair competition.

Select Usage (details) :



Start of Performance as Acceptance of Offer cartoons image illustration picture
Start of Performance as Acceptance of Offer

Description:
Scoular Co. v. Denney; Acceptance of a contract offer is defined as words or conduct that, when objectively viewed, manifests an intent to accept the offer; UCC; Uniform Commercial Code.

Select Usage (details) :



Mirror Image Rule cartoons image illustration picture
Mirror Image Rule

Description:
DTE Energy Technologies, Inc. v. Briggs Electric, Inc.; different terms in an acceptance ordinarily do not become a part of the contract; UCC; Uniform Commercial Code.

Select Usage (details) :



Gap Filler in Contracts cartoons image illustration picture
Gap Filler in Contracts

Description:
Griffith v. Clear Lakes Trout Co., Inc.; destruction of contracts based on uncertainty;

Select Usage (details) :



Statute of Frauds Defense cartoons image illustration picture
Statute of Frauds Defense

Description:
168th and Dodge, LP v. Rave Reviews Cinemas, LLC; even implied in fact contrs, implied in law contracts and promissory estoppel claims are subject to the statute of frauds defense.

Select Usage (details) :



Reformation and Mutual Mistake cartoons image illustration picture
Reformation and Mutual Mistake

Description:
OneBeacon America Insurance Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois; reformation fixes a mistaken writing, not a mistaken agreement; scrivener's error.

Select Usage (details) :



Severance of Illegal Provision of Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Severance of Illegal Provision of Contract

Description:
Broadley v. Mashpee Neck Marina, Inc.; courts sever illegal contract terms; reformation does not apply; boilerplatej contracts; contracts of adhesion; unconscionable contracts; public policy.

Select Usage (details) :



Assignment of a Legal Malpractice Claim cartoons image illustration picture
Assignment of a Legal Malpractice Claim

Description:
Gurski v. Rosenblum and Filan, LLC; public policy considerations prohibit assigning claim to adversary.

Select Usage (details) :



Merger Clause cartoons image illustration picture
Merger Clause

Description:
Suburban Leisure Center, Inc. v. AMF Bowling Products, Inc; merger clauses do not impact prior agreements covering different subjects; merger clause, integration clause; parol evidence rule.

Select Usage (details) :



Non-Disclosure Agreement Narrowly Construed cartoons image illustration picture
Non-Disclosure Agreement Narrowly Construed

Description:
ConFold Pacific, Inc. v. Polaris Industries, Inc.; unambiguous contract language must be enforced as it is written; extrinsic evidence.

Select Usage (details) :



Insurance Policy Contract Interpretation cartoons image illustration picture
Insurance Policy Contract Interpretation

Description:
In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation; an insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed using the general rules of contract interpretation; ejusdem generis, expressio unius est exclusio alterius, noscitur a sociis.

Select Usage (details) :



Insurance Coverage Against Terrorist Attacks cartoons image illustration picture
Insurance Coverage Against Terrorist Attacks

Description:
Omni Berkshire Corp. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A; demanding insurance coverage for terrorism is reasonable post-9/11.

Select Usage (details) :



Non-Conforming Goods, Cure Executory Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Non-Conforming Goods, Cure Executory Contract

Description:
Dynamic Machine Works, Inc. v. Machine & Electrical Consultants, Inc.; buyer may retract extension of time to cure defect unless the retraction unjust due to seller's material change of position in reliance on the waiver.

Select Usage (details) :



Change In Law Excuses Contract Performance cartoons image illustration picture
Change In Law Excuses Contract Performance

Description:
Centex Corporation v. Dalton; foreseeability; impossibility; impracticability; quantum meruit; non-occurrence a basic assumption.

Select Usage (details) :



Wholesale Value as Measure of Damages cartoons image illustration picture
Wholesale Value as Measure of Damages

Description:
Illinois Central R.R. Co. v. Crail; common law remedy for contract damages is wholesale rather than retail value.

Select Usage (details) :



Reliance Damages Calculation cartoons image illustration picture
Reliance Damages Calculation

Description:
L. Albert & Son v. Armstrong Rubber Co.

Select Usage (details) :



Hadley v. Baxendale Rule cartoons image illustration picture
Hadley v. Baxendale Rule

Description:
Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.; consequential damages for breach of contract are those reasonably supposed to be in the contemplation of the parties at the time the contract is made.

Select Usage (details) :



New Business Rule Damages for Lost Profits cartoons image illustration picture
New Business Rule Damages for Lost Profits

Description:
MindGames, Inc. v. Western Publishing Co.; the "new business" rule and Hadley v. Baxendale don't say that damages for lost profits are never recoverable.

Select Usage (details) :



Assumpsit on a Quantum Meruit cartoons image illustration picture
Assumpsit on a Quantum Meruit

Description:
Stark v. Parker; voluntarily quitting a job ahead of schedule may terminate the obligation of payment.

Select Usage (details) :



Contractual Penalties cartoons image illustration picture
Contractual Penalties

Description:
Muldoon v. Lynch; contract damages ought to be compensatory and commensurate with the damages suffered; forfeiture clause; liquidated damages penalty clause.

Select Usage (details) :



Liquidated Damages Clause Not A Penalty cartoons image illustration picture
Liquidated Damages Clause Not A Penalty

Description:
Samson Sales, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.; liquidated damages are not a penalty when: (1) damages uncertain in amount and difficult to prove; (2) contract as a whole not unconscionable, unreasonable, and disproportionate (3) damages consistent.

Select Usage (details) :



Prohibitory Injunction cartoons image illustration picture
Prohibitory Injunction

Description:
Lumley v. Wagner; specific performance denied; power to order affirmative injunction; enjoin.

Select Usage (details) :



Promissory Estoppel or Bargained-For Exchange cartoons image illustration picture
Promissory Estoppel or Bargained-For Exchange

Description:
Ricketts v. Scothorn; a promise not supported by consideration may be enforceable if induced promisee to rely on it to detriment; estoppel quid pro quo.

Select Usage (details) :



Promissory Estoppel cartoons image illustration picture
Promissory Estoppel

Description:
First National Bank of Logansport v. Logan Mfg. Co.; reliance damages; promisor who induces substantial change in position by promisee in reliance on promise is estopped to deny enforceability of the promise.

Select Usage (details) :



Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. cartoons image illustration picture
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

Description:
nundum pactum; unilateral offer; gratuitous offer; firm offer rule; performance of conditions for reward offered in advertisement accepts offer, creating a contract for payment of the reward.

Select Usage (details) :



Contracts Must Include all Essential Terms cartoons image illustration picture
Contracts Must Include all Essential Terms

Description:
Sun Printing & Publishing Association v. Remington Paper and Power Co., Inc.; The court is not at liberty to revise an agreement while attempting to construe it.

Select Usage (details) :



Contracts Enforced According to Their Terms cartoons image illustration picture
Contracts Enforced According to Their Terms

Description:
W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. Giancontieri; if terms of a contract are set out in a clear, complete document, writing enforced according to its terms, without reference to outside evidence regarding what the parties really intended.

Select Usage (details) :



Special Meaning of a Contract Term cartoons image illustration picture
Special Meaning of a Contract Term

Description:
Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S. International Sales Corp.; the party advocating special meaning for a contractual term has burden of proving that the special meaning was intended by both parties.

Select Usage (details) :



Knock Out Rule and UCC Gap Filler cartoons image illustration picture
Knock Out Rule and UCC Gap Filler

Description:
Richardson v. Union Carbide Indus. Gases, Inc.; conflicting contract terms fall out and are replaced to the extent necessary by Uniform Commercial Code gap-filler provisions.

Select Usage (details) :



Laidlaw v. Organ cartoons image illustration picture
Laidlaw v. Organ

Description:
The fact that a party is under no duty to disclose a fact does not excuse that party from making a false disclosure.

Select Usage (details) :



At Will Employment Termination cartoons image illustration picture
At Will Employment Termination

Description:
Dore v. Arnold Worldwide, Inc.; at-will employment may be terminated by the employee or employer at any time, with or without cause.

Select Usage (details) :



Unconscionable Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Unconscionable Contract

Description:
Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co; an installment contract that denies the buyer a meaningful choice and contains unfair terms is unenforceable; doctrine of unconscionability.

Select Usage (details) :



Contractual Duty Of Good Faith cartoons image illustration picture
Contractual Duty Of Good Faith

Description:
Market Street Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Frey; a contracting party cannot be allowed to use its own breach to gain an advantage by impairing the rights that the contract confers on the other party.

Select Usage (details) :



Breach of Trivial Condition of Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Breach of Trivial Condition of Contract

Description:
Jacob & Youngs v. Kent; a trivial, innocent omission will not always be a failure of a condition that causes forfeiture of the contract.

Select Usage (details) :



Perfect Tender Rule cartoons image illustration picture
Perfect Tender Rule

Description:
Printing Center of Texas, Inc. v. Supermind Pub. Co.; a buyer may reject goods that do not conform to the contract in each and every respect.

Select Usage (details) :



Lumley v. Gye cartoons image illustration picture
Lumley v. Gye

Description:
Tortious interference with contractual relations; inducement of breach of contract.

Select Usage (details) :



Tortious Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage cartoons image illustration picture
Tortious Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage

Description:
Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.; established contracts merit greater protection than potential contracts.

Select Usage (details) :



Consultant's Privilege cartoons image illustration picture
Consultant's Privilege

Description:
J.D. Edwards & Co. v. Podany; an advisor may offer good-faith advice to a client without fear of liability should the client act on that advice to the harm of a third person.

Select Usage (details) :



In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation cartoons image illustration picture
In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation

Description:
Flood exclusions are applied to levee failures in insurance policy agreements.

Select Usage (details) :



Retraction of Extension of Time to Cure Defect cartoons image illustration picture
Retraction of Extension of Time to Cure Defect

Description:
Dynamic Machine Works, Inc. v. Machine & Electrical Consultants, Inc.; buyer may retract unless material change of position by seller in reliance on the waiver of time to deliver.

Select Usage (details) :



Defective Goods cartoons image illustration picture
Defective Goods

Description:
Fitl v. Strek. Whether a seller received notification of a defect in goods is a factual question and depends upon unfarily prejudicing: allowing the seller to correct the defect, prepare for negotiation and litigation, and protect against stale claims.

Select Usage (details) :



Revocation of Acceptance cartoons image illustration picture
Revocation of Acceptance

Description:
Waddell v. L.V. R.V. A buyer may revoke acceptance of goods when a nonconformity impairs the value of the goods to the individual buyer, taking into account the needs and circumstances of the individual buyer. Revocation.

Select Usage (details) :



Bank Check Processing Standards cartoons image illustration picture
Bank Check Processing Standards

Description:
Valley Bank of Ronan v. Hughes. The U.C.C. establishes a bank's standard of care for the processing of checks but does not preempt common law tort claims regarding communications about the processing of checks. Mutual Mistake.

Select Usage (details) :



Check Forgery or Check Alteration cartoons image illustration picture
Check Forgery or Check Alteration

Description:
Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Foster Bancshares, Inc. When there is doubt as to whether an instrument has been forged or merely altered, the court will assume that the instrument was altered. Presentment Warranty.

Select Usage (details) :



Banks Must Use Due Care cartoons image illustration picture
Banks Must Use Due Care

Description:
Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of America v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. A bank or other institution that receives a check for deposit has a duty to exercise due care to make sure that the depositor is the intended recipient of the funds. Subrogate.

Select Usage (details) :



Borrower Representations cartoons image illustration picture
Borrower Representations

Description:
In re Troupe. Representations made by a debtor in a purchase-money security agreement regarding the intended use of the collateral will be binding on the debtor and will determine whether the collateral is for business or personal purposes.

Select Usage (details) :



Security Interest cartoons image illustration picture
Security Interest

Description:
Border State Bank of Greenbush v. Bagley Livestock Exchange, Inc. A security interest may attach if the debtor has rights in the collateral, but there is no requirement that the debtor own the collateral. Conversion.

Select Usage (details) :



Security Interests On Title cartoons image illustration picture
Security Interests On Title

Description:
Metzger v. Americredit Financial Services, Inc. A buyer of goods, who gives value for the goods and receives them after the certificate of title is issued, takes the goods free of a security interest perfected in another jurisdiction.

Select Usage (details) :



Commercially Unreasonable Sale cartoons image illustration picture
Commercially Unreasonable Sale

Description:
R & J of Tennessee, Inc. v. Blankenship-Melton Real Estate, Inc. The determination of whether a sale of collateral was commercially reasonable requires a consideration of the totality of the circumstances surrounding the sale.

Select Usage (details) :



Secured Party cartoons image illustration picture
Secured Party

Description:
Coxall v. Clover Commercial Corp. A secured party may not recover a deficiency judgment if sale of the collateral was commercially unreasonable, but the debtor may recover damages for the creditor's failure to comply with legal requirements for a sale.

Select Usage (details) :



Essential Terms cartoons image illustration picture
Essential Terms

Description:
Academy Chicago Publishers v. Cheever; valid contract; parties must agree to all essential terms; it is not the court's job to rewrite an agreement to make it a valid contract.

Select Usage (details) :



Legal Issues with IVF cartoons image illustration picture
Legal Issues with IVF

Description:
A.Z. v. B.Z.; Prior agreements to enter into familial relationships should not be enforced against individuals who subsequently reconsider their decisions. IVF agreement. In Vitro Fertilization.

Select Usage (details) :



Forum Selection cartoons image illustration picture
Forum Selection

Description:
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute; a reasonable forum selection clause constitutes consent to be sued in the forum state.

Select Usage (details) :



Agreement to Negotiate in Good Faith cartoons image illustration picture
Agreement to Negotiate in Good Faith

Description:
Copeland v. Baskin Robbins U.S.A.; an agreement to agree is unenforceable but an agreement to negotiated in good faith is enforceable.

Select Usage (details) :



Promissory Estoppel cartoons image illustration picture
Promissory Estoppel

Description:
Garwood Packaging Co. v. Allen & Co., Inc.; salesmanship; mere puffery does not form basis for promissory estoppel claim.

Select Usage (details) :



IVF Consent Agreements cartoons image illustration picture
IVF Consent Agreements

Description:
Kass v. Kass; IVF consent agreements may be enforced even if circumstances have changed.

Select Usage (details) :



Arbitration Clause cartoons image illustration picture
Arbitration Clause

Description:
Nagrampa v. MailCoups, Inc.; contract terms take it or leave it; one-sided arbitration provisions are not enforceable.

Select Usage (details) :



In Court Agreement cartoons image illustration picture
In Court Agreement

Description:
Powell v. City of Newton; parties must abide by in court agreement, even if the agreement is unsigned.

Select Usage (details) :



Offer and Acceptance cartoons image illustration picture
Offer and Acceptance

Description:
Power Paragon, Inc. v. Precision Technology USA, Inc.; purchase order constitutes offer and shipment of the product constitutes acceptance

Select Usage (details) :



Unilateral Mistake cartoons image illustration picture
Unilateral Mistake

Description:
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp.; unilateral mistake is not enough for a court to order rescission or reformation.

Select Usage (details) :



Conversion of Goods cartoons image illustration picture
Conversion of Goods

Description:
Admiralty Island Fisheries, Inc. v. Millard Refrigerated Services, Inc.; limitation of liability in a warehouse receipt will limit liability, unless the damage was from the the warehouse's conversion of the goods to its own use.

Select Usage (details) :



Fraudulent Transfer cartoons image illustration picture
Fraudulent Transfer

Description:
Aptix Corp. v. Quickturn Design Systems, Inc.; A transfer is fraudulent if made with the actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor; loan was a fraudulent transfer. Badges of Fraud.

Select Usage (details) :



Apparent Authority cartoons image illustration picture
Apparent Authority

Description:
Azur v. Chase Bank, USA; Unauthorized use of a credit card is use of the card by someone without actual, implied, or apparent authority to make charges, and from which the cardholder receives no benefit.

Select Usage (details) :



Price Setting cartoons image illustration picture
Price Setting

Description:
Casserlie v. Shell Oil Co.; claim for bad faith price setting; a price in an open price contract is set in good faith if it is commercially reasonable and nondiscriminatory; disparate pricing between jobbers and dealers is not evidence of discrimination

Select Usage (details) :



U.C.C. cartoons image illustration picture
U.C.C.

Description:
Central Washington Refrigeration, Inc. v. Barbee; Uniform Commercial Code; indemnity actions are governed by separate statute of limitation; implied right of indemnity; separate equitable cause of action; UCC.

Select Usage (details) :



Altering the U.C.C. cartoons image illustration picture
Altering the U.C.C.

Description:
Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Wachovia Bank, Natl. Assn.; A bank is strictly liable for paying an unauthorized check unless the bank and the customer agree otherwise; subrogation; forged check.

Select Usage (details) :



Wire Transfer cartoons image illustration picture
Wire Transfer

Description:
Experi-Metal, Inc. v. Comerica Bank; authenticity of payment orders must be verified pursuant to a comercially reasonable security procedure; unauthorized wire transfer order.

Select Usage (details) :



Lost Check cartoons image illustration picture
Lost Check

Description:
Fifth Third Bank v. Jones; A check is taken for an obligation when it is given as payment, without regard to the payee's internal procedures; missing check; deed of trust.

Select Usage (details) :



Lease or Sale cartoons image illustration picture
Lease or Sale

Description:
Gibraltar Financial Corp. v. Prestige Equipment Corp.; court must consider economic reality of transaction to detemine whether it was a lease or a sale subject to a security agreement.

Select Usage (details) :



Security Interest cartoons image illustration picture
Security Interest

Description:
Helms v. Certified Packaging Corp.; security interest includes the proceeds from a recovery for decreased value of collateral, and not for loss of use of the collateral; destroyed property; damaged property.

Select Usage (details) :



Stated Income Loan cartoons image illustration picture
Stated Income Loan

Description:
In re Dixon Ford; stated income mortgage; holder in due course; mortgage application fraud; loan application altered income stated.

Select Usage (details) :



Financing Statement Search cartoons image illustration picture
Financing Statement Search

Description:
In re John\'s Bean Farm of Homestead, Inc.; bankruptcy; wrong name; computer search string; incorrect identification of a debtor on a financing statement is seriously misleading.

Select Usage (details) :



Mere Puffery cartoons image illustration picture
Mere Puffery

Description:
In re Toshiba America HD DVD Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation; express warranty is not created by mere puffery; a statement about future performance may create express warranty if it is an affirmation or representation. performance.

Select Usage (details) :



Buyer In Ordinary Course cartoons image illustration picture
Buyer In Ordinary Course

Description:
In re Western Iowa Limestone, Inc.; buyer in the ordinary course of business may take constructive possession of goods; BOC; free of security interest.

Select Usage (details) :



Perfected Status cartoons image illustration picture
Perfected Status

Description:
In re Wild West World, L.L.C., Debtor; bankrupcty; notice to creditors; claimed security interest requires timely filing in order to obtain perfected status.

Select Usage (details) :



Cross-Collateral cartoons image illustration picture
Cross-Collateral

Description:
In re Zaochney; A dragnet clause or cross-collateralization clause that provides that collateral in one transaction will be security for other obligations is enforceable.

Select Usage (details) :



Fraudulent Conveyance cartoons image illustration picture
Fraudulent Conveyance

Description:
James H. Rice Co. v. McJohn; A fraudulent transfer of propoerty to avoid debt will be set aside; fraudulent conveyance of asset is null and void; levy.

Select Usage (details) :



Economic Loss Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Economic Loss Doctrine

Description:
Lincoln Co. v. Detroit Diesel Corp. General Insurance; breach of warranty; no exception to the economic loss doctrine for damages to a defective product when an inherent defect makes the product unreasonably dangerous.

Select Usage (details) :



Duty to Investigate cartoons image illustration picture
Duty to Investigate

Description:
Lindholm v. Brant; Andy Warhol; Red Elvis; usual or customary practices; reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing; authority to convey title; good faith; fraud and embezzlement.

Select Usage (details) :



Breach of Warranty cartoons image illustration picture
Breach of Warranty

Description:
Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.; Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act; breach of warranty claim; statute of limitations; repair claims do not accrue upon delivery of the product.

Select Usage (details) :



U.C.C. Filler cartoons image illustration picture
U.C.C. Filler

Description:
Northrop Corp. v. Litronic Industries; mirror image rule; common law mirror image rule does not apply to U.C.C. contracts; U.C.C. filler used when materially different terms in offer and acceptance.

Select Usage (details) :



Statutes of Repose cartoons image illustration picture
Statutes of Repose

Description:
Peters v. Riggs Natl. Bank, N.A.; Equitable tolling does not apply to statutes of repose; statute of limitation; the time limit can be shortened by contract or mutual agreement.

Select Usage (details) :



Premises Liability cartoons image illustration picture
Premises Liability

Description:
Flippo v. Mode O'Day Frock Shops of Hollywood; implied warranty of merchantability; defect that attaches itself to product is not product defect or breach of warranty.

Select Usage (details) :



Third Party Beneficiary Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Third Party Beneficiary Contract

Description:
Basic Capital Management, Inc. v. Dynex Commercial, Inc.; benefit to third party must be written in the contract; court will not create a third party beneficiary contract by implication; no implied contract for third party.

Select Usage (details) :



Prevention Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Prevention Doctrine

Description:
Berry v. Time Insurance Co.; implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; duty of good faith; duty to prevent injury.

Select Usage (details) :



Oral Promise cartoons image illustration picture
Oral Promise

Description:
Blinn v. Beatrice Community Hosp. and Health Center, Inc.; promissory estoppel; at-will employee; wrongful termination of employment.

Select Usage (details) :



Expectation Damages cartoons image illustration picture
Expectation Damages

Description:
Dynalectric Co., Inc. v. Clark & Sullivan Constructors, Inc.; promissory estoppel; general contractor; subcontractor; reliance damages; restitution damages.

Select Usage (details) :



Calculation of Damages cartoons image illustration picture
Calculation of Damages

Description:
Edge Group WAICCS LLC v. Sapir Group LLC; specific performance; accurate calculation of damages; damages determination.

Select Usage (details) :



Incorporation by Reference cartoons image illustration picture
Incorporation by Reference

Description:
Grandis Family Partnership, Ltd. v. Hess Corp.; arbitration agreement incorporated by reference; independent document.

Select Usage (details) :



Binding Agreement cartoons image illustration picture
Binding Agreement

Description:
Grosvenor v. Qwest Corp.; multiple notices to internet user of specific contractual terms of use may cause binding agreement.

Select Usage (details) :



Four Corners Rule cartoons image illustration picture
Four Corners Rule

Description:
Hemenway v. Peabody Coal Co.; The meaning of a contract must be found within its four corners; four corners rule.

Select Usage (details) :



Doctrine of Avoidable Consequences cartoons image illustration picture
Doctrine of Avoidable Consequences

Description:
In re WorldCom, Inc.; the duty to mitigate damages bars recovery for losses suffered by a non-breaching party that could have been avoided by reasonable effort and without the risk of substantial loss or injury.

Select Usage (details) :



Undue Influence cartoons image illustration picture
Undue Influence

Description:
Kelly v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.; Undue influence is persuasion that tends to be coercive in nature and that overcomes the will without convincing the judgment.

Select Usage (details) :



Statute of Frauds Exception cartoons image illustration picture
Statute of Frauds Exception

Description:
Kolkman v. Roth; an exception to the statute of frauds applies in cases of promissory estoppel.

Select Usage (details) :



Construction Defect Damages cartoons image illustration picture
Construction Defect Damages

Description:
Landis v. William Fannin Builders, Inc.; damages in an action for breach of a construction contract is the cost to repair the deficient work; economic waste doctrine.

Select Usage (details) :



Oral Promise Unenforceable cartoons image illustration picture
Oral Promise Unenforceable

Description:
Marmer v. Kaufman; Oral promises are unenforceable for lack of consideration where the promisor receives no benefit by enforcement of the promise and the promisee suffers no legal detriment.

Select Usage (details) :



Repudiation cartoons image illustration picture
Repudiation

Description:
Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. U.S.; if a party repudiates a contract, the other party is entitled to restitution for any benefit he has conferred on the repudiating party by way of part performance or reliance.

Select Usage (details) :



Condition Precedent cartoons image illustration picture
Condition Precedent

Description:
Moore Bros. Co. v. Brown & Root, Inc.; prevention doctrine is if a promisor prevents or hinders fulfillment of a condition to his performance, the condition may be waived or excused.

Select Usage (details) :



Agreement to Arbitrate cartoons image illustration picture
Agreement to Arbitrate

Description:
Rent-A-Center v. Jackson; The Federal Arbitration Act puts arbitration agreements on equal footing with other contracts, and requires courts to enforce them according to their terms; unconscionability challenges.

Select Usage (details) :



Online Agreements cartoons image illustration picture
Online Agreements

Description:
Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.; clicking on a DOWNLOAD button does not communicate assent to contractual terms if the offer did not make clear; inquiry notice; constructive notice.

Select Usage (details) :



Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel cartoons image illustration picture
Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel

Description:
Stewart v. Cendant Mobility Services Corp.; a promise that the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance and does is binding if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise.

Select Usage (details) :



Material Breach of Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Material Breach of Contract

Description:
Strouth v. Pools by Murphy and Sons, Inc.; A material breach of a contract by one party justifies the other party's termination of the agreement. Substantial performance doctrine.

Select Usage (details) :



Mutual Mistake cartoons image illustration picture
Mutual Mistake

Description:
Tracy v. Morell; even when there is no fraud, there may be mutual mistake; where both parties share a common false assumption about a vital fact upon which their bargain is based, the transaction may be avoided.

Select Usage (details) :



Right to Walk Away cartoons image illustration picture
Right to Walk Away

Description:
United Rentals, Inc. v. RAM Holdings, Inc.; When the examination of extrinsic evidence does not lead to an obvious, objectively reasonable conclusion, the court may apply the forthright negotiator principle.

Select Usage (details) :



Extrinsic Evidence on Indefinite Term cartoons image illustration picture
Extrinsic Evidence on Indefinite Term

Description:
Vohs v. Donovan; A contract is not enforceable if an essential term is indefinite or a promise to perform is illusory, but may enforce if extrinsic evidence makes more definite and the promise to perform less illusory.

Select Usage (details) :



Disgorgement cartoons image illustration picture
Disgorgement

Description:
Watson v. Cal-Three, LLC; When the breaching party's wrongdoing is intentional or substantial, recovery of the breaching party's profits may be granted. Expectancy damages; lost profit damages.

Select Usage (details) :



Doctrine of Impossibility cartoons image illustration picture
Doctrine of Impossibility

Description:
YPI 180 N. LaSalle Owner, LLC v. 180 N. LaSalle II, LLC; the doctrine of impossibility of performance excuses performance if objectively impossible due to destruction of the subject matter of the contract or by operation of law.

Select Usage (details) :



Contract Amendment cartoons image illustration picture
Contract Amendment

Description:
Beneficial National Bank, U.S.A. v. Obie Payton; when the parties' original agreement specifically permits amendments, new terms may be added rather than just changes existing terms.

Select Usage (details) :



Contract Acceptance Online cartoons image illustration picture
Contract Acceptance Online

Description:
Cairo, Inc. v. Crossmedia Services, Inc.; when a benefit is offered subject to stated conditions, and the offeree takes the benefit with knowledge of the terms of the offer, the taking constitutes acceptance of the terms.

Select Usage (details) :



Liquidated Damages in Consumer Contracts cartoons image illustration picture
Liquidated Damages in Consumer Contracts

Description:
Cellphone Termination Fee Cases; Liquidated damages provisions in consumer contracts are presumed void, and the burden is on the proponent of such clauses to rebut that presumption.

Select Usage (details) :



Preliminary Injunction Contract Term cartoons image illustration picture
Preliminary Injunction Contract Term

Description:
Ed Bertholet & Associates, Inc. v. Ed Stefanko; Contract provisions requiring the issuance of an injunction are not binding on the trial court; granting or denying a preliminary injunction rests within the trial court's equitable discretion,

Select Usage (details) :



Letters of Intent cartoons image illustration picture
Letters of Intent

Description:
Empro Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Ball-Co Manufacturing, Inc.; an agreement that is made subject to a later agreement is not sufficiently definite to be a binding contract.

Select Usage (details) :



Stale Debt cartoons image illustration picture
Stale Debt

Description:
First Hawaiian Bank v. Jack Zukerhorn; A new promise by the debtor to pay his debt, whether or not then barred by the applicable statute of limitations, binds the debtor for a new limitations period.

Select Usage (details) :



Detrimental Reliance cartoons image illustration picture
Detrimental Reliance

Description:
Frank Dixon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; promissory estoppel will be applied when the promisor makes a promise that the promisee reasonably and foreseeably relies on to his or her detriment.

Select Usage (details) :



Federal Arbitration Act cartoons image illustration picture
Federal Arbitration Act

Description:
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc.; The FAA provides the exclusive grounds for expedited vacatur and modification of arbitration awards. These grounds are extreme such ascorruption, fraud, partiality, misconduct, etc.

Select Usage (details) :



As Is Clause cartoons image illustration picture
As Is Clause

Description:
Lenawee County Board of Health v. William and Martha Messerly; as-is clause may defeat grant of rescission for mutual mistake relating to a basic assumption that materially affects the parties' agreed performance.

Select Usage (details) :



Gift is Not Consideration cartoons image illustration picture
Gift is Not Consideration

Description:
Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. American Ash Recycling Corp.; The bargain theory of consideration does not actually require that the parties bargain over the terms of the agreement; rather, a promise and a reciprocal conventional inducement.

Select Usage (details) :



Double Indemnification cartoons image illustration picture
Double Indemnification

Description:
Peter Kossian v. American National Insurance Co.; Under the equitable doctrine of unjust enrichment, one party should not be indemnified twice for the same loss.

Select Usage (details) :



Damages for Tortious Interference with Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Damages for Tortious Interference with Contract

Description:
Rite Aid Corp. v. Lake Shore Investors; damages for tortious contractual interference may include pecuniary loss of the benefits of the contract; consequential losses; emotional distress and actual harm to reputation, and punitive damages.

Select Usage (details) :



Contractual Basis for Arbitration cartoons image illustration picture
Contractual Basis for Arbitration

Description:
Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.; A party may not be compelled under the FAA to submit to class arbitration unless there is a contractual basis for concluding that the party agreed to do so. Federal Arbitration Act.

Select Usage (details) :



Material Alteration of Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Material Alteration of Contract

Description:
Bayway Refining Co. v. Oxygenated Marketing & Trading A.G.; the burden of proving that additional terms would be a material alteration of the contractual obligation is on the party who objects; surprised party.

Select Usage (details) :



Part Performance cartoons image illustration picture
Part Performance

Description:
Beaver v. Brumlow; if oral contract not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds has been performed to such an extent it would be inequitable to deny enforcement, may bar the Statute of Frauds defense; part performance; specific performance.

Select Usage (details) :



Adequate Assurances cartoons image illustration picture
Adequate Assurances

Description:
By-Lo Oil Co. v. ParTech, Inc.; The mere fact that performance is to become due is not reasonable grounds for insecurity. Between merchants, the reasonableness of the grounds will be determined by commercial standards.

Select Usage (details) :



Supplementary Terms cartoons image illustration picture
Supplementary Terms

Description:
C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc. v. Jordan Int'l Co.; The terms of a contract are the writings of the parties, along with supplementary terms incorporated by operation of law; gap-filler provisions of Article Two of the U.C.C.; additional terms.

Select Usage (details) :



Multiple Writings cartoons image illustration picture
Multiple Writings

Description:
Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.; Statute of Frauds does not require single writing; multiple writings ok if linked by a reference within them to the same subject matter or transaction. Signed and unsigned writings may be read together.

Select Usage (details) :



Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing cartoons image illustration picture
Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

Description:
De La Concha of Hartford, Inc. v. Aetna Life Insurance Company; breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing implies actual or constructive fraud, design to mislead or deceive, or neglect or refusal to fulfill contractual obligation.

Select Usage (details) :



Extrinsic Evidence Allowed cartoons image illustration picture
Extrinsic Evidence Allowed

Description:
Delta Dynamics, Inc. v. Arioto; Extrinsic evidence (parol evidence) will be admitted to explain an ambiguous term. Competing contract interpretations.

Select Usage (details) :



Third Party Beneficiary Not Explicit cartoons image illustration picture
Third Party Beneficiary Not Explicit

Description:
Detroit Institute of Arts Founders Society v. Rose; A contract may create an obligation to a third-party without containing express language creating that obligation. Incidental benefit to third party not enough.

Select Usage (details) :



Infancy Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Infancy Doctrine

Description:
Douglass v. Pflueger Hawaii, Inc.; the general rule that contracts entered into by minors are voidable does not apply in the employment context.

Select Usage (details) :



Induce Detrimental Reliance cartoons image illustration picture
Induce Detrimental Reliance

Description:
Drennan v. Star Paving Co.; A promise the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance of a definite and substantial character and that does is binding if neccessary to avoid injustice.

Select Usage (details) :



Forebearance as Consideration cartoons image illustration picture
Forebearance as Consideration

Description:
Dyer v. National By-Products, Inc.; Forbearance to assert a claim or defense that proves to be invalid is consideration if the forbearing party believes that the claim or defense may fairly be determined to be valid.

Select Usage (details) :



Moral Obligation is not Consideration cartoons image illustration picture
Moral Obligation is not Consideration

Description:
Harrington v. Taylor; A humanitarian act performed voluntarily is not sufficient consideration for a promise.

Select Usage (details) :



Puffery is not Fraud cartoons image illustration picture
Puffery is not Fraud

Description:
Speakers of Sports v. ProServ; A promise that is intended as aspirational, and that a reasonable person in the position of the promisee would understand as an expression of hope, is not an enforceable commitment.

Select Usage (details) :



Lack of Knowledge cartoons image illustration picture
Lack of Knowledge

Description:
Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp.; offeree is not bound by inconspicuous contractual provisions if contractual nature of document is not obvious, even if apparent manifestation of consent. Constructive notice; inquiry notice; arbiration.

Select Usage (details) :



Requirement Contracts Consideration cartoons image illustration picture
Requirement Contracts Consideration

Description:
Structural Polymer Group, Ltd. v. Zoltek Corp.; the implied obligation of good faith in requirements contracts is enough to avoid finding a contract null and void due to an illusory promise.

Select Usage (details) :



Unilateral Mistake Avoidance cartoons image illustration picture
Unilateral Mistake Avoidance

Description:
Sumerel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; If an offer contains a material mistake that was known by the other party, or the other had reason to know of it, the party who made the mistake has the power to avoid the contract.

Select Usage (details) :



Mailbox Rule cartoons image illustration picture
Mailbox Rule

Description:
United States Life Insurance Company v. Wilson; the common-law rule providing that acceptance of an offer is effective when it is sent will apply to electronic transactions that resemble traditional paper transactions.

Select Usage (details) :



Detrimental Reliance Promissory Estoppel cartoons image illustration picture
Detrimental Reliance Promissory Estoppel

Description:
Wright v. Newman; If the promises in connection with an invalid and unenforceable contract wrongfully cause a party to forgo a valuable legal right to his detriment, and promisor waives the right to repudiate the contract, the contract is enforceable.

Select Usage (details) :



Nonconforming Tender cartoons image illustration picture
Nonconforming Tender

Description:
Bartus v. Riccardi; seller may substitute a conforming tender if he had reasonable grounds to believe that the nonconforming tender would be accepted and he seasonably notifies the buyer of his intention to substitute conforming tender.

Select Usage (details) :



Guardianship cartoons image illustration picture
Guardianship

Description:
Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. Denison; Guardianship proceedings are treated as providing public notice of the ward's incapacity, even though the other party to a particular transaction may have no knowledge or reason to know of the guardianship.

Select Usage (details) :



Penalty Clause Damages cartoons image illustration picture
Penalty Clause Damages

Description:
Lake River Corp. v. Carborundum Co.; liquidated damages clauses are enforceable but penalty damages clauses are not enforceable.

Select Usage (details) :



Repudiate a Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Repudiate a Contract

Description:
Rocheux Int'l of N.J. v. U.S. Merchants Fin. Group; whether one party repudiated a contract or provided adequate assurance of future performance are questions of fact that must be decided by the trier of fact based on commercial standards.

Select Usage (details) :



Third Party Beneficiary Standing cartoons image illustration picture
Third Party Beneficiary Standing

Description:
Sisney v. State; a contract made expressly for the benefit of a third person may be enforced by that person, but only when the intent to make the contract inure to the benefit of the third party is clearly manifest.

Select Usage (details) :



Four Corners Exception cartoons image illustration picture
Four Corners Exception

Description:
Beanstalk Group, Inc. v. AM General Corp.; A contract will not be interpreted literally if doing so would produce absurd results. The parties are presumed to be rational persons pursuing rational ends.

Select Usage (details) :



Shrinkwrap Agreement cartoons image illustration picture
Shrinkwrap Agreement

Description:
DeFontes v. Dell, Inc.; Arbitration is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration unless agreed. Under the UCC, contracts for the sale of goods may be formed in any manner sufficient to show agreement.

Select Usage (details) :



Reward Offer Acceptance cartoons image illustration picture
Reward Offer Acceptance

Description:
Glover v. Jewish War Veterans of United States; No contract is formed when one acts consistently with the terms of an offer of a reward, but without knowing of the offer, because there is no intention to accept the offer.

Select Usage (details) :



Reward for Police Officers cartoons image illustration picture
Reward for Police Officers

Description:
Gray v. Martino; Public policy and sound morals alike forbid that public officers should demand or receive, for services performed in the discharge of their official duties.

Select Usage (details) :



Clickwrap Agreement cartoons image illustration picture
Clickwrap Agreement

Description:
Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph, Inc.; When customers are given notice of the terms and conditions of a contract via a clickwrap agreement and must affirmatively manifest assent by clicking I Agree, the clickwrap agreements is valid.

Select Usage (details) :



Windfall Damages cartoons image illustration picture
Windfall Damages

Description:
H-W-H Cattle Co., Inc. v. Schroeder; Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a buyer has two options when the seller fails to deliver: (1) the buyer may "cover" by making a good faith substitute purchase; or (2) recover damages for non-delivery.

Select Usage (details) :



Prevention Doctrine Rule cartoons image illustration picture
Prevention Doctrine Rule

Description:
Johnson v. Coss; the prevention doctrine operates as an exception to the general rule than one has no duty to perform under a contract containing a condition precedent until the condition occurs.

Select Usage (details) :



Moral Obligation as Consideration cartoons image illustration picture
Moral Obligation as Consideration

Description:
Mills v. Wyman; A promise based only on a moral obligation is made without consideration and not enforceable.

Select Usage (details) :



Inconspicuous Warranty Disclaimers cartoons image illustration picture
Inconspicuous Warranty Disclaimers

Description:
Moscatiello v. Pittsburgh Contractors Equipment Co.; The implied warranty of merchantability can be excluded from a contract only if the word "merchantability" is used and the language of the disclaimer is conspicuous.

Select Usage (details) :



Illusory Promise cartoons image illustration picture
Illusory Promise

Description:
Office Pavilion S. Florida, Inc. v. ASAL Prods., Inc.; Words of "promise" that by their terms make the putative promisor's performance optional do not constitute a promise at all and are not consideration for the return promise.

Select Usage (details) :



Promise to Impregnate cartoons image illustration picture
Promise to Impregnate

Description:
Perry v. Atkinson; there is no cause of action for the fraudulent breach of a promise to impregnate. Certain sexual conduct and interpersonal decisions are, on public policy grounds, outside the realm of tort liability.

Select Usage (details) :



Extrinsic Evidence to Show Context cartoons image illustration picture
Extrinsic Evidence to Show Context

Description:
Sanders v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.; The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing protects the reasonable expectations of the parties to a contract arising from its terms, and may be shown by extrinsic evidence.

Select Usage (details) :



Good Faith Obligation cartoons image illustration picture
Good Faith Obligation

Description:
Seggebrush v. Stosor; the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing includes a prohibition on cheating on the contract terms.

Select Usage (details) :



Pre-Contractual Misrepresentations cartoons image illustration picture
Pre-Contractual Misrepresentations

Description:
Snyder v. Lovercheck; a perpetrator of fraud cannot close the lips of his innocent victim by getting him blindly to agree in advance not to complain against it as a matter of public policy.

Select Usage (details) :



Implied in Law Contract cartoons image illustration picture
Implied in Law Contract

Description:
Vertex, Inc. v. City of Waterbury; unjust enrichment requires (1) that the defendants were benefited, (2) that the defendants unjustly did not pay the plaintiffs for the benefits, and (3) that the failure of payment was to the plaintiffs' detriment.

Select Usage (details) :



Moral Obligation is Consideration cartoons image illustration picture
Moral Obligation is Consideration

Description:
Webb v. McGowin; a moral obligation is sufficient consideration for a subsequent promise if the promisor has received a material benefit, even if the promisor had no original duty or liability.

Select Usage (details) :



Moral Obligation from Material Benefit cartoons image illustration picture
Moral Obligation from Material Benefit

Description:
Webb v. McGowin; the law recognizes a distinction between a promisor's moral obligation that results from a feeling of ethical obligation and one that results from conferring a material benefit to the promisor.

Select Usage (details) :



Conduct as Contract Waiver cartoons image illustration picture
Conduct as Contract Waiver

Description:
Wisconsin Knife Works v. National Metal Crafters; under the Uniform Commercial Code, an attempt at contract modification that does not satisfy a contractual requirement that modifications be in writing can operate as a waiver.

Select Usage (details) :



Extrinsic Evidence of Testator Intent cartoons image illustration picture
Extrinsic Evidence of Testator Intent

Description:
In re Estate of Cole; When construing contradictory provisions of a will, a court may consider direct evidence of a testator's intentions.

Select Usage (details) :