Cartoons, -> Tort Cartoons
apparent agency vicarious liability cartoons image illustration picture
apparent agency vicarious liability

Description:
Roessler v. Novak; a principal may be held liable for the acts of an agent if the principal permits the appearance of authority in the agent. Independent contractor.

Select Usage (details) :



res ipsa loquitur cartoons image illustration picture
res ipsa loquitur

Description:
States v. Lourdes Hospital; doctrine of res ipsa loquitor; factfinder; draw an inference of negligence; kind that ordinarily does not occur absent negligence.

Select Usage (details) :



economic loss rule cartoons image illustration picture
economic loss rule

Description:
532 Madison Avenue Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Center, Inc.; adjoining landowners; purely economic losses; construction defects.

Select Usage (details) :



Proximate Cause cartoons image illustration picture
Proximate Cause

Description:
Doe v. Manheimer; a negligent act is the legal cause of a plaintiff's injury only if the injury would not have occurred without the act, and if the negligent act was a substantial factor in producing the plaintiff's injury.

Select Usage (details) :



the firefighter's rule cartoons image illustration picture
the firefighter's rule

Description:
Levandoski v. Cone; the firefighter's rule does not bar recovery from a tortfeasor who is neither a landowner nor a person in control of the premises; invitee; licensee.

Select Usage (details) :



Website Owner Liability For Visitor Posts cartoons image illustration picture
Website Owner Liability For Visitor Posts

Description:
Carafano v. Metrosplash.com, Inc.; a website host is not liable for false information posted by a visitor as a publisher or speaker; invasion of privacy; defamation; right of publicity.

Select Usage (details) :



Fair Use Parody cartoons image illustration picture
Fair Use Parody

Description:
Winter v. DC Comics; copyright; the first amendment; appropriation of a likeness; more than merely copying the likenes; right of publicity claim; significant transformative elements; value of work does not derive primarily from celebrity's fame; fair use;

Select Usage (details) :



Premises Liability Waiver Agreement cartoons image illustration picture
Premises Liability Waiver Agreement

Description:
Dalury v. S-K-I Ltd. An exculpatory agreement requiring skiers to release a ski resort operator from liability for injuries sustained on the property is void as contrary to public policy.

Select Usage (details) :



Chain Of Causation cartoons image illustration picture
Chain Of Causation

Description:
Virden v. Betts and Beer Constr. Co.. Defendant's conduct is the proximate cause of a plaintiff's injury only if injury would not have occurred but for the defendant's conduct and was a substantial factor. But-for cause; substantial factor test.

Select Usage (details) :



Proximate Cause Only If Foreseeable cartoons image illustration picture
Proximate Cause Only If Foreseeable

Description:
Hebert v. Enos. Summary judgment is appropriate if the plaintiff's injuries were not a foreseeable result of the defendant's negligence.

Select Usage (details) :



Liability for Tree Damage cartoons image illustration picture
Liability for Tree Damage

Description:
Michalson v. Nutting. A landowner is at liberty to use his land, and all of it, to grow trees and is not liable for damage caused by the natural and reasonable extensions of boughs and penetration of roots over and into adjoining property.

Select Usage (details) :



Workers' Compensation Specific Intent cartoons image illustration picture
Workers' Compensation Specific Intent

Description:
Rainer v. Union Carbide Corp. An employer acts with deliberate intention, so the employee's injury is excepted from workers' compensation exclusivity, only when it determines to injure an employee and uses some means appropriate to that end.

Select Usage (details) :



National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act cartoons image illustration picture
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act

Description:
Pafford v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs. Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, a plaintiff may demonstrate causation only by proving that a vaccine was both a but-for cause and a substantial factor in causing her injury.

Select Usage (details) :



National Child cartoons image illustration picture
National Child

Description:
Doe a/k/a Twist v. TCI Cablevision The First Amendment protects the defendant's expressive speech against a plaintiff's right of publicity claim if newsworthy, but not if for profit.

Select Usage (details) :



Federal Tort Claims Act cartoons image illustration picture
Federal Tort Claims Act

Description:
United States v. Olsen. The Federal Tort Claims Act authorizes civil actions against the United States under circumstances in which a private person would be liable under the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.

Select Usage (details) :



Driver's Duty to Passengers cartoons image illustration picture
Driver's Duty to Passengers

Description:
Pipher v. Parsell; when the actions of a passenger that interfere with the driver's safe operation of his vehicle are foreseeable, the failure to prevent such conduct may be a breach of the driver's duty to other passengers or the public.

Select Usage (details) :



Damage Limits in Maritime Cases cartoons image illustration picture
Damage Limits in Maritime Cases

Description:
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker; In maritime cases, compensatory and punitive damages should be limited to a 1:1 ratio.; malice; remittur.

Select Usage (details) :



Stepparent Immunity for Negligent Supervision cartoons image illustration picture
Stepparent Immunity for Negligent Supervision

Description:
Zellmer v. Zellmer; Because a stepparent standing in loco parentis has a common law duty to support and educate a child to the same extent as a biological parent, he or she is also entitled to parental immunity for negligent supervision.

Select Usage (details) :



Immunity Statutes and Damages Limits Cannot Deny Meaningful Remedy cartoons image illustration picture
Immunity Statutes and Damages Limits Cannot Deny Meaningful Remedy

Description:
Clarke v. Oregon Health Sciences University; The Remedy Clause of the Oregon Constitution provides that, although the legislature may change a remedy or procedure, it cannot deny a remedy entirely.

Select Usage (details) :



Family Car Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Family Car Doctrine

Description:
Malchose v. Kalfell; The family car doctrine imposes liability on a vehicle owner for negligent operation of that vehicle with the owner's express or implied consent, for purposes of the business or pleasure of the owner's family; negligent entrustment.

Select Usage (details) :



The Medical Devise Amendments Prempt State Law cartoons image illustration picture
The Medical Devise Amendments Prempt State Law

Description:
Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.; The Medical Device Amendments preempt state requirements that are different from, or in addition to, any requirements applicable to a medical device under federal law; preemption.

Select Usage (details) :



Juries May Impose Higher Warning Standards than the FDA cartoons image illustration picture
Juries May Impose Higher Warning Standards than the FDA

Description:
Wyeth v. Levine; Where it is not impossible for a drug manufacturer to comply with both state and federal law, common law claims do not stand as an obstacle to the accomplishment of Congress's purposes in the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

Select Usage (details) :



Security Guards May Pursue Fleeing Suspects cartoons image illustration picture
Security Guards May Pursue Fleeing Suspects

Description:
Peters v. Menard, Inc; A merchant and its agents are immune from liability for actions taken while attempting to detain a person, including off-premises pursuit of that person, if reasonable cause to believe person violated the shoplifting law.

Select Usage (details) :



Standard Negligency Jury Instruction cartoons image illustration picture
Standard Negligency Jury Instruction

Description:
Bjorndal v. Weitman; person negligent if person fails exercise reasonable care measured by what reasonable person acting with ordinary prudence would do under the same or similar circumstances including emergencies.

Select Usage (details) :



Violation of Statute May Be Negligence Per Se cartoons image illustration picture
Violation of Statute May Be Negligence Per Se

Description:
O'Guin v. Bingham County; to replace a common law duty of care with a duty of care from a statute or regulation, the statute or regulation must clearly define the required standard of conduct, be intended to prevent the same type of harm.

Select Usage (details) :



No Nominal Damages in Negligence Actions cartoons image illustration picture
No Nominal Damages in Negligence Actions

Description:
Right v. Breen; when the action sounds in negligence, no purpose would be served by a nominal damages award; exemplary damages.

Select Usage (details) :



Proximate Cause in Negligence Action cartoons image illustration picture
Proximate Cause in Negligence Action

Description:
Hale v. Ostrow; negligence claim requires proof by preponderance of evidence of both causation in fact and proximate causation; both generally involve questions of fact for jury unless uncontroverted facts or all reasonable inferences; but-for-cause.

Select Usage (details) :



Superceding Cause of Injury cartoons image illustration picture
Superceding Cause of Injury

Description:
Delaney v. Reynolds; When an intervening occurrence was foreseeable, the causal chain of events remains intact and the defendant's original negligence remains a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury; intervening cause; superseding cause.

Select Usage (details) :



Schools Have a Duty to Protect Students cartoons image illustration picture
Schools Have a Duty to Protect Students

Description:
Christensen v. Royal School District No. 160; Contributory fault may not be assessed against thirteen-year-old child based on failure to protect from sexual abuse when defendant stands in special relationship to child and has duty to protect child.

Select Usage (details) :



Assumption of Risk in Sports cartoons image illustration picture
Assumption of Risk in Sports

Description:
Avila v. Citrus Community College District; Primary assumption of risk arises when as matter of law and policy defendant owes no duty to protect a plaintiff from particular harms; demurrer.

Select Usage (details) :



Hospital Liability for Discharging Unstable Patients cartoons image illustration picture
Hospital Liability for Discharging Unstable Patients

Description:
Lewellen v. Schneck Medical Center; A hospital must provide appropriate medical screening within emergency department; the patient may not be discharged until he has received stabilizing treatment or has been appropriately transferred.

Select Usage (details) :



Sovereign Immunity under FTCA cartoons image illustration picture
Sovereign Immunity under FTCA

Description:
United States v. Olson; FTCA requires a court to look to state law on the liability of private entities, not public entities, when assessing the government's liability in activities that private persons do not perform; discretionary function.

Select Usage (details) :



Discretionary Function Exception to Government Liability cartoons image illustration picture
Discretionary Function Exception to Government Liability

Description:
Whisnant v. United States; Because removing an obvious health hazard is a matter of safety rather than policy, the government's alleged failure to do so is not protected under discretionary function exception.

Select Usage (details) :



Duty to Aid Strangers cartoons image illustration picture
Duty to Aid Strangers

Description:
Podias v. Mairs; common law has persistently refused to impose on strangers a moral obligation to aid another human being who is in danger but an exception exists for failure to render assistance when social policy justifies imposition of duty to act.

Select Usage (details) :



Remedy for Breach of Contract is not Tort Action cartoons image illustration picture
Remedy for Breach of Contract is not Tort Action

Description:
Spengler v. ADT Security Services, Inc; under Michigan law action for an action in tort to arise out of a breach of contract, the act complained of must constitute (1) a breach of duty separate and distinct from the breach of contract, and (2) active negl

Select Usage (details) :



No Duty to Warn Unless a Special Relationship cartoons image illustration picture
No Duty to Warn Unless a Special Relationship

Description:
Iseberg v. Gross; An affirmative duty to warn or protect against the criminal conduct of a third party may be imposed on one for the benefit of another only if there exists a special relationship between them; agency; agent; principle.

Select Usage (details) :



Wrongful Death Action by Adult Children cartoons image illustration picture
Wrongful Death Action by Adult Children

Description:
Weigel v. Lee; Compensable damages in wrongful death actions specifically include both economic and non-economic damages, the latter of which include mental anguish, emotional distress, and loss of consortium damages; survival action.

Select Usage (details) :



Liability for Hiring An Incompetent Contractor cartoons image illustration picture
Liability for Hiring An Incompetent Contractor

Description:
Puckrein v. ATI Transport, Inc; to prevail against principal for hiring incompetent contractor plaintiff must show contractor was incompetent, unskilled perform job for which hired, the harm arose due to incompetence and principal knew incompetent.

Select Usage (details) :



Design Defect cartoons image illustration picture
Design Defect

Description:
Merck & Co. v. Garza; Courts should allow a party to present the best available evidence and only then should determine from a totality of the evidence, considering all factors, whether there is legally sufficient evidence to support judgment.

Select Usage (details) :



Workers' Compensation Injury Requirements cartoons image illustration picture
Workers' Compensation Injury Requirements

Description:
Wait v. Traveler's Indemnity Co. of Illinois; to recover under Tennessee Workers' Compensation Act, injury must both arise out of and occur in the course of an employee's employment.

Select Usage (details) :



Student Acting Under Doctor Authority Does Not Commit Battery cartoons image illustration picture
Student Acting Under Doctor Authority Does Not Commit Battery

Description:
Mullins v. Parkview Hospital, Inc; In order to state a claim for battery, the plaintiff must show that the defendant acted intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the plaintiff.

Select Usage (details) :



Res Ipsa Loquitur in Med Mal cartoons image illustration picture
Res Ipsa Loquitur in Med Mal

Description:
Sides v. St. Anthony's Medical Center. A plaintiff in a medical malpractice case can use res ipsa loquitur theory where the plaintiff offers a medical expert's opinion that the injury would not have occurred in the absence of negligence by the defendant.

Select Usage (details) :



Foreseeability Is A Fact Question cartoons image illustration picture
Foreseeability Is A Fact Question

Description:
A.W. v. Lancaster County School District 0001. Questions of foreseeability in the context of determining whether an alleged tortfeasor's duty to take reasonable care has been breached must be decided by the finder of fact. Avoid Jury Trial.

Select Usage (details) :



Loss of Chance In Medical Malpractice cartoons image illustration picture
Loss of Chance In Medical Malpractice

Description:
Matsuyama v. Birnbaum. When a physician's negligence reduces or eliminates the patient's prospects for achieving a more favorable medical outcome, the physician has harmed the patient and is liable for damages. Wrongful Death Action.

Select Usage (details) :



Direct Loss In Tort cartoons image illustration picture
Direct Loss In Tort

Description:
In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. If reasonably foreseen that an act may cause harm, tortfeasor is liable for damages, regardless of whether type and extent of damages are reasonably foreseeable.

Select Usage (details) :



Contract of Adhesion cartoons image illustration picture
Contract of Adhesion

Description:
Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp. The law disfavors contracts that relieve a person from his own negligence. An agreement violates public policy if it adversely affects the public interest. Liability waiver.

Select Usage (details) :



Learned Intermediary Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Learned Intermediary Doctrine

Description:
State v. Karl. Manufacturers of prescription drugs are subject to the same duty to warn consumers about the risks of their products as other manufacturers.

Select Usage (details) :



Lead Paint Case cartoons image illustration picture
Lead Paint Case

Description:
State of Rhode Island v. Lead Industries Association, Inc. A public nuisance is an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public by a person or persons with control over the instrumentality alleged to have created the nuisance.

Select Usage (details) :



Stealing Electronic Records cartoons image illustration picture
Stealing Electronic Records

Description:
Thyroff v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. Electronic records are subject to the common law tort of conversion.

Select Usage (details) :



Economic Loss Rule cartoons image illustration picture
Economic Loss Rule

Description:
Affiliated FM Ins. Co. v. LTK Consulting Services, Inc.; The economic loss rule, a doctrine that has attempted to describe the dividing line between the law of torts and the law of contracts, should not be treated as a bright line rule.

Select Usage (details) :



Slip and Fall Damages cartoons image illustration picture
Slip and Fall Damages

Description:
Averyt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; Where the jury's damages award is supported by the evidence, a reviewing court will not reverse it.

Select Usage (details) :



No Joint and Several Liability cartoons image illustration picture
No Joint and Several Liability

Description:
Board of County Commissioners of Teton County v. Bassett; each defendant in a case is liable only to the extent of that defendant's proportion of the total fault in Wyoming.

Select Usage (details) :



No Claim for Emotional Distress cartoons image illustration picture
No Claim for Emotional Distress

Description:
Catron v. Lewis; an action for negligent infliction of emotional distress must show either (1) reasonably foreseeably "bystander" victim based on an intimate familial relationship, or (2) a "direct victim" because was within the zone of danger.

Select Usage (details) :



Duty Based on Public Policy cartoons image illustration picture
Duty Based on Public Policy

Description:
Diaz v. Phoenix Lubrication Service, Inc.; an actor whose conduct has not created a risk of physical harm to another has no duty of care to the other unless there is some other affirmative basis for the existence of a duty.

Select Usage (details) :



New Damages Trial cartoons image illustration picture
New Damages Trial

Description:
Dillon v. Frazer; new damages trial if verdict is so grossly inadequate or excessive as to shock the conscience and clearly indicates passion, caprice, prejudice, partiality, corruption, or some other improper motive.

Select Usage (details) :



NTMVSA cartoons image illustration picture
NTMVSA

Description:
Doomes v. Best Transit Corp.; the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act includes a savings clause stating that compliance with a motor vehicle safety standard does not exempt liability at common law. Premeption Doctrine.

Select Usage (details) :



Abnormally Dangerous Activity cartoons image illustration picture
Abnormally Dangerous Activity

Description:
Dyer v. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc.; an abnormally dangerous activity is subject to liability for harm to the person, land, or chattels of another from the activity, even if has exercised the utmost care to prevent the harm. Strict Liability.

Select Usage (details) :



No Duty to Assist cartoons image illustration picture
No Duty to Assist

Description:
Estate of Cilley v. Lane; Maine law does not impose a general obligation to protect others from harm not created by the actor.

Select Usage (details) :



Shopkeeper's Privilege cartoons image illustration picture
Shopkeeper's Privilege

Description:
Gortarez v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc.; A merchant with reasonable cause may detain in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable time any person suspected of shoplifting for questioning or summoning a law enforcement officer.

Select Usage (details) :



Market Share Liability Theory cartoons image illustration picture
Market Share Liability Theory

Description:
Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.; Under the market share liability theory, liability will be apportioned to each defendant according to its share of the market for the product giving rise to the plaintiff's injuries.

Select Usage (details) :



Open and Obvious Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Open and Obvious Doctrine

Description:
Kentucky River Medical Center v. McIntosh; a possessor of land is not liable to invitees for physical harm caused by an activity or condition whose danger is known or obvious, unless should have anticipated despite knowledge or obviousness.

Select Usage (details) :



Substantial Factor Test for Causation cartoons image illustration picture
Substantial Factor Test for Causation

Description:
Lasley v. Combined Transport, Inc.; factual cause exists if someone examining the event without regard to legal consequences would conclude that the allegedly faulty conduct or condition in fact played a role in its occurrence.

Select Usage (details) :



Discovery Rule cartoons image illustration picture
Discovery Rule

Description:
Lincoln Electric Co. v. McLemore; A plaintiff's cause of action accrues at the point at which he discovered, or by reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury. Statute of limitations.

Select Usage (details) :



Intervening Acts cartoons image illustration picture
Intervening Acts

Description:
Marcus v. Staubs; a tortfeasor whose negligence is a substantial factor in bringing about injuries is not relieved from liability by the intervening acts of third persons if those acts were reasonably foreseeable by the original tortfeasor.

Select Usage (details) :



Computing Punitive Damages cartoons image illustration picture
Computing Punitive Damages

Description:
Mathias v. Accor Economy Lodging, Inc.; there are no definitive rules establishing a precise methodology for computing punitive damages.

Select Usage (details) :



Vicarious Liability cartoons image illustration picture
Vicarious Liability

Description:
Mavrikidis v. Petullo; when a person engages a contractor, who conducts an independent business by means of his own employees, he is not liable for the negligent acts of the contractor.

Select Usage (details) :



Loss of Chance Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Loss of Chance Doctrine

Description:
Mohr v. Grantham; treating the loss of chance as a cognizable injury permits plaintiffs to recover for the loss of an opportunity for a better outcome. But for causation. Substantial Factor Test.

Select Usage (details) :



Parental Immunity Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Parental Immunity Doctrine

Description:
Neel v. Sewell; claims of negligent supervision are properly viewed as involving the exercise of reasonable parental authority over a child, and are thus barred by parental immunity.

Select Usage (details) :



Intervening Cause cartoons image illustration picture
Intervening Cause

Description:
Pohl v. County of Furnas; an intervening cause cuts off a tortfeasor's liability only when it is not foreseeable; tthe new and independent conduct of a third person is itself the proximate cause of the injury and breaks the causal connection.

Select Usage (details) :



Sudden Emergency Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Sudden Emergency Doctrine

Description:
Posas v. Horton; The fact that the actor is not negligent after the emergency arises does not preclude his liability for tortious conduct that produced the emergency.

Select Usage (details) :



Feres Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Feres Doctrine

Description:
Purcell v. United States; under the Feres doctrine, the government is not liable under the FTCA for injuries to servicemen where the injuries arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service.

Select Usage (details) :



Qualified Immunity cartoons image illustration picture
Qualified Immunity

Description:
Sama v. Hannigan; Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions (medical care here), from liability for civil damages if conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights.

Select Usage (details) :



Risk Standard cartoons image illustration picture
Risk Standard

Description:
Thompson v. Kaczinski; a actor's liability is limited to those physical harms that result from the risks that made the actor's conduct tortious. The scope of liability issue is fact intensive as to foreseeability.

Select Usage (details) :



Self Defense for Physical Harm Only cartoons image illustration picture
Self Defense for Physical Harm Only

Description:
Touchet v. Hampton; mere words, even though designed to excite or irritate, cannot excuse a battery. The privilege of self-defense is based on the prevention of harm to the actor, not on the desire for retaliation or revenge.

Select Usage (details) :



Child Liability in Tort cartoons image illustration picture
Child Liability in Tort

Description:
Van Camp v. McAfoos; A child cannot be held liable in tort without some allegation of negligence or wrongful conduct on his or her part.

Select Usage (details) :



Implied Preemption cartoons image illustration picture
Implied Preemption

Description:
Vreeland v. Ferrer; if federal law does not expressly preempt state law, preemption may be inferred only if scheme of federal regulation is sufficiently comprehensive to reasonably infer Congress left no room for supplementary state regulation.

Select Usage (details) :



Landlord Duty to Tenants cartoons image illustration picture
Landlord Duty to Tenants

Description:
Ward v. Inishmaan Assocs. Ltd. Partnership; Generally speaking, landlords have no duty to protect tenants from criminal attack by third parties.

Select Usage (details) :



Online Defamation cartoons image illustration picture
Online Defamation

Description:
Blumenthal v. Drudge; Under the Communications Decency Act, no provider or user of interactive computer service treated as publisher or speaker of information provided by another content provider for tort liability. ISP. Internet Service Provider.

Select Usage (details) :



Market Share Liability Rule cartoons image illustration picture
Market Share Liability Rule

Description:
Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories; when the precise defendant cannot be identified through no fault of the plaintiff, liability may be apportioned based on the share of the market held by each negligent manufacturer. Summers v. Tice.

Select Usage (details) :



Online Writings are Defamatory cartoons image illustration picture
Online Writings are Defamatory

Description:
Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. Delfino; written defamatory communications published by means of the Internet are properly characterized as libel, not slander. No prior restraint.

Select Usage (details) :