Cartoons, -> Criminal Law Cartoons
Creative Accounting cartoons image illustration picture
Creative Accounting

Description:
White collar crime cartoon; Arthur Andersen LLP; withhold documents; alter documents; destroy documents.

Select Usage (details) :



Mousetrap  cartoons image illustration picture
Mousetrap Cartoon

Description:
Right to an attorney; call my lawyer; custody; custodial interrogation; need a lawyer.

Select Usage (details) :



Daniel M'Naughten cartoons image illustration picture
Daniel M'Naughten

Description:
Dog is upset because police officer thinks he has culpability but the cat does not.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Bowen cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Bowen

Description:
Gazelle tells lion that charging at him constitutes an attempt on his life.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Taylor cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Taylor

Description:
Getaway car driver worries about his accomplices committing felony murder in liquor store.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Whitmarsh cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Whitmarsh

Description:
Gay rights; same sex marriage; sodomy laws; dog refuses sex with cat.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Bergman cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Bergman

Description:
Elderly man argues for no custody time since he will not be a recidivist.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Escamilla cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Escamilla

Description:
Firearm accidentally goes off while pointed at a man during an argument.

Select Usage (details) :



Commonwealth v. Poindexter cartoons image illustration picture
Commonwealth v. Poindexter

Description:
In the absence of a statutory definition of the elements of a crime, a court must resort to the common law for guidance; sodomy.

Select Usage (details) :



Locke v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Locke v. State

Description:
Oral sex performed upon a woman constitutes a crime against nature; due process clause.

Select Usage (details) :



Locke v. Rose cartoons image illustration picture
Locke v. Rose

Description:
A statute is void for vagueness if it fails to specify the conduct punishable thereunder such that the defendant lacks fair warning that his conduct violates the statute. Habeas corpus; per curiam; opinion; vagueness doctrine; void for vagueness.

Select Usage (details) :



Rose v. Locke cartoons image illustration picture
Rose v. Locke

Description:
Vagueness doctrine; void for vagueness. Court broad construction of a state criminal statute provides fair notice that statutory language will encompass conduct related to that forbidden by the statute.

Select Usage (details) :



Wilson v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Wilson v. State

Description:
Ex post facto law. A statute may not be retroactively enforced against conduct that was not illegal at the time it was committed.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Mullen cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Mullen

Description:
Absent legislative intent indicating otherwise, repeal or amendment of statute prior to criminal defendant prosecution that renders conduct engaged in by defendant no longer criminal bars further prosecution; deterrence; retribution; savings clause.

Select Usage (details) :



Perkins v. State of North Carolina cartoons image illustration picture
Perkins v. State of North Carolina

Description:
Cruel and unusual punishment is an evolving doctrine and depends on the prevailing societal views of the relative punishment afforded to a specific crime. Habeas corpus; ineffective assistance of counsel; nolo contendere.

Select Usage (details) :



Pierce v. Commonwealth cartoons image illustration picture
Pierce v. Commonwealth

Description:
Home rule ordinance. Local municipalities may not enact local legislation directly conflicting with state statutes establishing a comprehensive scheme for criminal punishment.

Select Usage (details) :



Regina v. Cunningham cartoons image illustration picture
Regina v. Cunningham

Description:
Maliciously requires a showing that the defendant acted with an actual intent to cause the particular kind of harm done or that the particular kind of harm might result from his actions. Malicious; malicious act.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Rocker cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Rocker

Description:
Indecent exposure can be established by an inference of the defendant's general intent to be seen by the public.

Select Usage (details) :



Ford v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Ford v. State

Description:
Transferred intent is inapplicable to offenses requiring the specific intent to inflict specific harm upon a specific individual; assault; general intent.

Select Usage (details) :



Smallwood v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Smallwood v. State

Description:
Merely exposing another to the risk of contracting HIV does not establish intent to kill; attempt; specific intent.

Select Usage (details) :



Sandstrom v. Montana cartoons image illustration picture
Sandstrom v. Montana

Description:
Jury instructions that, by conclusive presumption or misleading directions, shift the burden of proof on an essential element of the crime to the defendant violate the Due Process Clause. Burden of production; burden of persuasion.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Jewell cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Jewell

Description:
One acts knowingly not only with positive knowledge, but also with an awareness of a high probability that a fact exists; actual knowledge; wilfull blindness.

Select Usage (details) :



Barnes v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Barnes v. United States

Description:
When common sense and experience suggest defendant must have known or been aware of a high probability of existence of a fact, the jury may infer his knowledge as element of crime charged. Inference; knowing.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Hazelwood cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Hazelwood

Description:
Application of simple negligence standard in criminal proceedings does not violate Due Process Clause; governmental interests deterring similar future conduct outweigh infringement personal freedom. Criminal negligence; strict liability.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Larson cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Larson

Description:
Recklessness is conscious and unjustifiable disregard of substantial risk that offender's conduct may cause certain result or may be of certain nature. Reckless disregard.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Cushman cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Cushman

Description:
When, by statute, recklessness is established without existence of actual danger, defendant may not escape liability because he was without power to cause danger to his victim. Reckless; reckless endangerment.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Stepniewski cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Stepniewski

Description:
Strict liability. Due process does not require intent to violate the law as element of the crime.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Sexton cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Sexton

Description:
Evidence of the mistaken belief relates to whether the State has failed to prove the essential mental element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Mistake of fact; reckless.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Marrero cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Marrero

Description:
Mistake of law does not relieve a defendant from criminal liability unless it negates the mental element required for conviction.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Caddell cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Caddell

Description:
Unconsciousness is an affirmative defense requiring defendant to prove beyond reasonable doubt that mental element of crime is negated by his unconsciousness. Burden of persuasion; burden of production; insanity; mens rea; voluntary.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Gory cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Gory

Description:
Possession requires knowingly exercising immediate and exclusive control over an object. Willful.

Select Usage (details) :



Wheeler v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Wheeler v. United States

Description:
Constructive possession of controlled substance is established when the defendant is knowingly in a position or has the right to exercise dominion or control over it, and has some appreciable ability to guide its destiny.

Select Usage (details) :



County Court of Ulster County v. Allen cartoons image illustration picture
County Court of Ulster County v. Allen

Description:
Permissive presumption is constitutional if there exists a rational connection between the proof and the facts presumed. Possession.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Williquette cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Williquette

Description:
Omission to act by one under a legal duty to do so is sufficient for criminal liability if it is a substantial factor in bringing about the consequences prohibited by statute. Child abuse; information.

Select Usage (details) :



Hughes v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Hughes v. State

Description:
Unborn fetus is a human being within the meaning of the state homicide statute. Born alive rule; manslaughter; misdemeanor manslaughter.

Select Usage (details) :



Mullaney v. Wilbur cartoons image illustration picture
Mullaney v. Wilbur

Description:
Malice afterthought. Due Process Clause requires the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of heat of passion when it is at issue in a homicide prosecution. Habeas corpus; manslaughter; mens rea; murder.

Select Usage (details) :



Patterson v. New York cartoons image illustration picture
Patterson v. New York

Description:
Heat of passion. Due process does not require the prosecution to disprove all affirmative defenses that may be available to defendant, so long as it has proven guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. manslaughter; murder.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Washington cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Washington

Description:
Heat of passion is determined by the standard of an ordinary, reasonable person without consideration of unique individual characteristics.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Berry cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Berry

Description:
Cooling-off period. Voluntary manslaughter is the unlawful killing of a human being, without malice, upon a sudden quarrel or in the heat of passion.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Guthrie cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Guthrie

Description:
Premeditation. To establish first-degree murder, premeditation must be proved by evidence that defendant considered his decision to kill for some period of time before act of killing. Deliberate first- degree murder; intent; second-degree murder.

Select Usage (details) :



Hyam v. Director of Public Prosecutions cartoons image illustration picture
Hyam v. Director of Public Prosecutions

Description:
One who, with full knowledge of the dangers involved, deliberately exposes a person to danger of death or bodily injury is liable for murder upon death of victim. Homicide; malice afterthought; manslaughter; murder.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Goodseal cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Goodseal

Description:
Felony murder must be based on an underlying felony that is inherently dangerous to human life. Felony-murder rule.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Rose cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Rose

Description:
Causation. Criminal conviction for manslaughter must be based on the actions that cause the victim's death. reasonable doubt.

Select Usage (details) :



Kibbe v. Henderson cartoons image illustration picture
Kibbe v. Henderson

Description:
Causation; habeas corpus; intervening cause; second-degree murder; superseding cause. Failure to instruct the jury on a material element of the prosecution's case violates the defendant's due process rights.

Select Usage (details) :



Regina v. Blaue cartoons image illustration picture
Regina v. Blaue

Description:
One who inflicts an injury upon another that results in death cannot avoid liability because the victim could have taken better care of himself or herself. Diminished capacity; intervening cause; manslaughter; murder; superseding cause.

Select Usage (details) :



Gregg v. Georgia cartoons image illustration picture
Gregg v. Georgia

Description:
Death penalty is not cruel and unusual punishment under appropriate circumstances. Bifurcated trial.

Select Usage (details) :



Pate v. Robinson cartoons image illustration picture
Pate v. Robinson

Description:
Under state law, a defendant must be afforded a hearing to determine his competency to stand trial when evidence suggests the defendant may have suffered from insanity at the time the crime was committed. Incompetency.

Select Usage (details) :



Jackson v. Indiana cartoons image illustration picture
Jackson v. Indiana

Description:
Fourteenth Amendment; pending criminal charges; insufficient basis for applying lesser procedural or substantive safeguards to prior civil commitment than otherwise afforded similarly situated persons. Civil commitment; incompetency; insanity.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Brawner cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Brawner

Description:
Model Penal Code criminal defendant not responsible for actions result of a mental disease or defect if lacks substantial capacity either to appreciate criminality or make conduct conform requirements law. Insanity defense; mental illness.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. McVey cartoons image illustration picture
State v. McVey

Description:
Diminished responsibility defense not applicable to general intent crimes. Insanity defense; diminished capacity; specific intent defense.

Select Usage (details) :



Powell v. Texas cartoons image illustration picture
Powell v. Texas

Description:
Chronic alcoholics are not afforded a constitutional defense against criminal liability. Actus reus; cruel and unusual punisment; intoxication; mens rea; public intoxication; voluntary intoxication.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Moore cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Moore

Description:
Drug addiction is not a common law defense to criminal charges of drug possession. Addict; drug addict; mens rea.

Select Usage (details) :



Montana v. Egelhoff cartoons image illustration picture
Montana v. Egelhoff

Description:
Due Process Clause does not require a state to consider evidence of voluntary intoxication to negate the mental element of a crime. Mens rea; specific intent.

Select Usage (details) :



City of Minneapolis v. Altimus cartoons image illustration picture
City of Minneapolis v. Altimus

Description:
Defendant who is mentally deficient due to involuntary intoxication is relieved of criminal responsibility if he is left temporarily insane. Mens rea; pathological intoxication.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Q.D. cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Q.D.

Description:
Infancy defense to the capacity to understand the wrongfulness of minor's actions applies to juvenile adjudications and may be rebutted only by clear and convincing evidence. Criminal capacity; minority.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Peterson cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Peterson

Description:
Castle doctrine; no retreat rule. Self-defense must be in response to an actual or reasonably perceived unlawful and immediate threat of deadly force by another and must reasonably relate to the threat faced.

Select Usage (details) :



Bechtel v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Bechtel v. State

Description:
Expert testimony concerning battered woman syndrome is relevant to the reasonableness of actions done in self-defense.

Select Usage (details) :



Law v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Law v. State

Description:
Justifiable homicide; justification; mitigating circumstance; necessity. If lawful occupant of house maintains reasonable apprehension that unlawful intruder will commit murder robbery burglar rape, then occupant justified using necessary force.

Select Usage (details) :



Bishop v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Bishop v. State

Description:
Homeowner may not use a mechanical device in defense of his property when he is not present in the home and is therefore incapable of developing a reasonable belief that the intruder entered with the intent to commit a felony. Justification.

Select Usage (details) :



Tennessee v. Garner cartoons image illustration picture
Tennessee v. Garner

Description:
Deadly force; Fourth Amendment. Officers may not use deadly force to prevent the escape of a felony suspect unless officer has probable cause that suspect presents a threat to the life or safety of the officer or others. Seizure.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Hobson cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Hobson

Description:
Resisting arrest. Common-law rule permitting an arrestee to resist forcibly an unlawful arrest must be abolished, absent unreasonable police force.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Wilder cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Wilder

Description:
Assault; child endangerment; child abuse. To trigger criminal liability resulting from parental discipline, physical harm must cause more than minor pain or temporary marks and be grossly deviate from reasonable person.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Warshow cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Warshow

Description:
Necessity defense requires an emergency situation not caused by the criminal actor, requiring otherwise criminal action to avoid an imminent risk of death or injury.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. LaFleur cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. LaFleur

Description:
One under pressure of unlawful threat of harm from another, commits what would otherwise be crime may, under some circumstances justified by act but duress does not mitigate murder to voluntary manslaughter. Mitigating; circumstance.

Select Usage (details) :



Washington v. Glucksberg cartoons image illustration picture
Washington v. Glucksberg

Description:
Right to commit suicide is not a fundamental liberty interest entitled to protection under Fourth Amendment. Consent; euthanasia; substantive due process.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Hiott cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Hiott

Description:
Defense of consent is not available to a participant in an unlawful contest that violates public policy.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Garoutte cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Garoutte

Description:
State compromise statute applies equally to high misdemeanors as to simple misdemeanors in the absence of legislative clarification. Misdemeanor manslaughter.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Alston cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Alston

Description:
Consent; rape. Defendant can be guilty of raping someone with whom he has engaged in a consensual sexual relationship.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Thompson cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Thompson

Description:
Intercourse is considered to be without consent if the victim is compelled to engage in intercourse under a threat of force or fear of imminent death or bodily harm. Threat; probable cause.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Evans cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Evans

Description:
Sexual intercourse that is achieved by fraud or trickery is not considered rape.

Select Usage (details) :



Jones v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Jones v. State

Description:
Force necessary to sustain a rape conviction can be inferred from the circumstances if it is reasonable to conclude the attacker was willing to use force. Constructive; implied.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Liberta cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Liberta

Description:
Husband can be convicted of raping his own wife.

Select Usage (details) :



Owens v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Owens v. State

Description:
Statutory rape. Law protects children under the age of fourteen from sexual conduct, regardless of whether the offender intended to engage in the act with one under the age of fourteen or whether the victim consented to the act.

Select Usage (details) :



Director of Public Prosecutions v. Morgan cartoons image illustration picture
Director of Public Prosecutions v. Morgan

Description:
If a man believed a woman was consenting to the intercourse and would not have attempted it but for that belief, he cannot be found guilty of rape. Specific intent.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Harris cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Harris

Description:
Person commits an attempt-type offense when, with intent to commit a specific offense, he does any act that constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that offense. Attempted murder.

Select Usage (details) :



In Re Smith cartoons image illustration picture
In Re Smith

Description:
Attempt requires specific intent to commit a particular crime, and a direct ineffectual act done towards its commission. Effective assistance of counsel; habeas corpus; ineffective assistance of counsel; kidnapping preparation.

Select Usage (details) :



Regina v. Eagleton cartoons image illustration picture
Regina v. Eagleton

Description:
Under the last act rule, actions constitute attempt to commit crime if actions are the last act required to accomplish the crime. false pretenses; intent.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Rizzo cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Rizzo

Description:
Attempt to commit a crime must be established by acts that so proximate to commission of crime that there is a reasonable probability crime would have been committed but for timely interference. Legal impossibility; preparation; robbery.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Orndorff cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Orndorff

Description:
Acts in preparation to commit future crime do not constitute attempt if actor abandons act before committing crime. preparation; test.

Select Usage (details) :



Commonwealth v. Skipper cartoons image illustration picture
Commonwealth v. Skipper

Description:
Preparation to commit a future crime does not constitute an attempt if the actor can abandon the act before committing the crime. Prison breach.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Bowen cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Bowen

Description:
Overt act can only be found under unequivocal circumstances that corroborate the felonious intent. Attempt; larceny.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Thomas cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Thomas

Description:
Legal impossibility is not defense in court-martial proceeding when the defendants committed the necessary criminal acts with the intent to commit crime. Attempt; rape.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Staples cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Staples

Description:
Actions in furtherance of crime are not mere preparation so long as they are substantial step toward commission of crime. Attempt; burglary.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. James cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. James

Description:
Express agreement between the parties does not need to be proved in order to prove conspiracy.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. St. Christopher cartoons image illustration picture
State v. St. Christopher

Description:
Inchoate offense; meeting of the minds. Person cannot be guilty of conspiracy when the only person with whom he has conspired or agreed has feigned agreement.

Select Usage (details) :



Mitchell v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Mitchell v. State

Description:
One can conspire to commit second-degree murder, even though premeditation is not an element of that crime. Deliberation.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Lauria cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Lauria

Description:
In order to make supplier of goods or services a participant in a criminal conspiracy to use goods or services for illegal purpose, the supplier must have knowledge illegal use and intent further illegal use. Felony; misdemeanor; probable cause.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Feola cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Feola

Description:
Assailant does not need to be aware that victim is federal officer in order to be held criminally liable for conspiracy to commit assault on federal officer engaged in performance of his official duties.

Select Usage (details) :



Shaw v. Director of Public Prosecutions cartoons image illustration picture
Shaw v. Director of Public Prosecutions

Description:
Common law provides that it is a crime to corrupt public morals, and one who aids another in doing so can be found guilty of conspiracy to corrupt public morals. Corruption.

Select Usage (details) :



Ventimiglia v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Ventimiglia v. United States

Description:
Legal impossibility. Alleged conspirators can be punished even if the objective of the conspiracy cannot be achieved, though the conspirators mistakenly believe it can. Taft-Hartley Act [labor management relations act].

Select Usage (details) :



Braverman v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Braverman v. United States

Description:
Single agreement to commit one or many crimes can only be punished as one conspiracy.

Select Usage (details) :



Kotteakos v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Kotteakos v. United States

Description:
Multiple parties who conspire with same individual for same unlawful act to be performed on separate occasions cannot be held liable for one general conspiracy.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Bruno cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Bruno

Description:
Chain conspiracy; wheel conspiracy. If group of smugglers, distributors, and retailers work together to import and sell drugs, agreement and cohesive network creates conspiracy including each person involved in distribution chain.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Michelena-Orovio cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Michelena-Orovio

Description:
Chain conspiracy. Conviction for conspiracy may be upheld based on only one single act from which knowledge and participation may be inferred.

Select Usage (details) :



Grunewald v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Grunewald v. United States

Description:
If principal objectives of conspiracy are accomplished, a subsidiary conspiracy to conceal cannot be implied from circumstantial evidence indicating conspiracy kept secret and that conspirators took steps to cover up crime to avoid detection.

Select Usage (details) :



Iannelli v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Iannelli v. United States

Description:
Double-jeopardy clause. Person can be separately convicted of both conspiracy to commit a crime and commission of that crime even if that person is the only party to the agreement who participated in the substantive offense.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Lubow cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Lubow

Description:
One who solicits another to engage in conduct constituting a crime can be held criminally liable for solicitation of that crime.

Select Usage (details) :



Hicks v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Hicks v. United States

Description:
In order to be guilty of aiding and abetting, defendant must have intended to advise or assist another with criminal act. Aid and Abet.

Select Usage (details) :



Bailey v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Bailey v. United States

Description:
In order to be guilty of aiding and abetting another with the commission of a crime, the defendant must have voluntarily associated himself with the endeavor. Directed verdict; perpetrator.

Select Usage (details) :



Bogdanov v. People cartoons image illustration picture
Bogdanov v. People

Description:
Complicity liability for criminal behavior of another exists if the defendant aids, abets, or advises other person in committing criminal offense of which he had knowledge and that was actually committed. Strict liability.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Gladstone cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Gladstone

Description:
Defendant is guilty of aiding and abetting another if he consciously acted in accordance or association with the principal to accomplish the crime. Conspiracy nexus.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Marshall cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Marshall

Description:
Alleged accomplice's accountability rests on his level of complicity in the misconduct, because guilt for criminal behavior must be based on personal behavior. Involuntary manslaughter; principal.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Diaz cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Diaz

Description:
Conspirator may be liable for criminal offenses committed by co-conspirator if those offenses were within scope of conspiracy, are in furtherance of conspiracy and reasonably foreseeable as natural consequence of conspiracy. Co-conspirator.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Carter cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Carter

Description:
Voluntary participation in one felonious act makes person liable for any other criminal acts that naturally flow from his participation. Felony murder.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Kessler cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Kessler

Description:
If defendant assists another in planning or commission of criminal offense, he is legally responsible for any criminal act that other person does in furtherance of planned criminal act. Acquiescence.

Select Usage (details) :



People v.  Taylor cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Taylor

Description:
Collateral estoppel bars retrial of issue decided previous trial if issues tried at both trials are identical, previous trial resulted judgment on merits and party against whom collateral estoppel assessed was party or was in privity with party at first t

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Bryan cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Bryan

Description:
Duped principal need not be convicted of substantive offense in order for another defendant to be convicted of aiding and abetting. Averment; criminal intent.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Adams cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Adams

Description:
Renunciation. Defendant may successfully assert the renunciation defense only if he has voluntarily and actively rejected the planned offense.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Cota cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Cota

Description:
Person who would otherwise be guilty as an accomplice because of assistance or encouragement is not guilty if the crime is defined so that participation by another is inevitably incident to its commission. Complicity; directed verdict.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Beaudry cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Beaudry

Description:
Vicarious liability. Employer is vicariously liable for the criminal acts of its employees committed within the scope of their employment.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Akers cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Akers

Description:
Parents cannot be held vicariously criminally liable for their children's criminal offenses. Exception.

Select Usage (details) :



Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance Co. cartoons image illustration picture
Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance Co.

Description:
Corporation may be held criminally responsible for the acts of its agents if the corporation placed the agent in a position in which he has enough authority to act on behalf of the corporation in handling that particular corporate business.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Park cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Park

Description:
Corporate officers can be held personally criminally liable for a corporation's acts. Interstate commerce.

Select Usage (details) :



Stephens v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Stephens v. State

Description:
Person is an accessory after the fact if he renders assistance with the intent to help a criminal avoid detection and arrest.

Select Usage (details) :



Holland v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Holland v. State

Description:
Misprision of felony, the common law providing that the bare failure of a person with knowledge of the commission of a felony must bring the crime to the attention of the proper authorities, is not a part of Florida substantive law.

Select Usage (details) :



Ewing v. California cartoons image illustration picture
Ewing v. California

Description:
Conviction felony grand theft under three-strikes law not grossly disproportionate and does not violate Eighth Amendment prohibition cruel unusual punishment. Deterrence, deterrent punishment; proportionality; recidivism; rehabilitation; retribution.

Select Usage (details) :



Ewing v. California b cartoons image illustration picture
Ewing v. California b

Description:
Deterrence, deterrent punishment; proportionality; recidivism; rehabilitation; retribution. Felony grand theft under three-strikes law is not grossly disproportionate, not violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

Select Usage (details) :



Apprendi v. New Jersey cartoons image illustration picture
Apprendi v. New Jersey

Description:
Due process considerations of Fifth Amendment, applied to states through Fourteenth Amendment, requires an increase in maximum prison sentence to be based on facts found by jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Evidentiary hearing; hate crime.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Newton cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Newton

Description:
Individual may not be charged with violating law when he has done no voluntary act to commit it. Habeas corpus.

Select Usage (details) :



Martin v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Martin v. State

Description:
Statute prohibiting intoxicated persons from appearing in any public place is not violated when intoxicated individual involuntarily taken into public; violation presumes that the public appearance was voluntary. Involuntary.

Select Usage (details) :



Robinson v. California cartoons image illustration picture
Robinson v. California

Description:
Status crime. It is unconstitutional, as cruel and unusual punishment, to prosecute a defendant for a crime based not on any voluntary act, but on his or her status or illness.

Select Usage (details) :



Johnson v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Johnson v. State

Description:
Delivering an illegal drug by way of the blood passing through the umbilical cord is not a violation of the statutory prohibition against delivery by an adult of a controlled substance to minor. Quash.

Select Usage (details) :



Chicago v. Morales cartoons image illustration picture
Chicago v. Morales

Description:
Fair warning; void for vagueness. Ordinance that seeks to impose criminal penalties for conduct by vaguely defined violations deemed to have been committed in discretion of law enforcement officers denies due process.

Select Usage (details) :



Lambert v. California cartoons image illustration picture
Lambert v. California

Description:
Law requiring registration of felon contravenes due process when person charged with violating the requirement had no reason to know of registration requirement.

Select Usage (details) :



Regina v. Faulkner cartoons image illustration picture
Regina v. Faulkner

Description:
Recklessness. Having the intent to commit a specific crime does not serve to establish the intent to commit a second crime that occurs by accident. Reckless.

Select Usage (details) :



Regina v. Prince cartoons image illustration picture
Regina v. Prince

Description:
It is not a defense to the crime of taking an underage girl that the defendant thought the girl was not underage when the statute does not make knowledge of the girl's age an element of the crime. Assizes.

Select Usage (details) :



Cheek v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Cheek v. United States

Description:
Good-faith belief that the tax laws did not impose a duty on him to file returns or pay taxes did not have to be objectively reasonable in order to be considered as a defense by the jury. Willfullness.

Select Usage (details) :



Commonwealth v. Twitchell cartoons image illustration picture
Commonwealth v. Twitchell

Description:
Statute insulating parents from prosecution for neglect of child welfare laws cannot avoid prosecution for involuntary manslaughter; parents permitted to assert affirmative defense reasonably relied Attorney General opinion. Parens patriae.

Select Usage (details) :



Stephenson v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Stephenson v. State

Description:
If victim commits suicide during course of kidnapping, defendant may not avoid responsibility for death by establishing that victim took poison voluntarily and caused her own death. Kidnap.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Kevorkian cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Kevorkian

Description:
Right to die laws; euthanasia; terminally ill; advance directives. Phyician assisted suicide is not murder, it is assisted suicide, a common-law felony in absence of statute that specifically prohibits assisting suicide.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Beardsley cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Beardsley

Description:
Absent legal duty, the law may not hold one responsible for a death resulting from the reckless or negligent actions of the victim himself or herself. Moral duty.

Select Usage (details) :



Francis v. Franklin cartoons image illustration picture
Francis v. Franklin

Description:
Shifting the burden of proof on an essential element of a criminal case back to the defendant violates the Due Process Clause. Inference; intent; resonable doubt; rebuttable; presumption.

Select Usage (details) :



Commonwealth v. Welansky cartoons image illustration picture
Commonwealth v. Welansky

Description:
Wanton or reckless conduct is intentional conduct, which may be either act of commission or omission when have duty to act, that involves high likelihood substantial harm will result to another. Involuntary manslaughter; manslaughter; willful.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Williams cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Williams

Description:
Conviction for statutory manslaughter requires showing of negligence that causes the death of another.

Select Usage (details) :



Mayes v. The People cartoons image illustration picture
Mayes v. The People

Description:
Malice may be implied when defendant actions were done without regard for the consequences of his or her actions. Mischief; murder; natural life; plaintiff in error.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Martin cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Martin

Description:
But-for-test; felony murder; felony murder rule. Felony murder if death is during commission of violent felony, death not too remote, accidental, or occurrence dependent volitional act another. Aggravated arson.

Select Usage (details) :



Tison v. Arizona cartoons image illustration picture
Tison v. Arizona

Description:
Felony-murder rule; simpliciter. Reckless indifference to innocent life, shown by participating in the events leading up to and following a murder, makes the death sentence constitutionally permissible.

Select Usage (details) :



Atkins v. Virginia cartoons image illustration picture
Atkins v. Virginia

Description:
Execution of mentally retarded person is unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment. deterence; retribution.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Leidholm cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Leidholm

Description:
battered-woman syndrome. In claim of self-defense, defendant conduct is evaluated according to what she in good faith honestly believed and had reasonable ground believe necessary protect defendant from death or great bodily injury.

Select Usage (details) :



The Queen v. Dudley & Stephens cartoons image illustration picture
The Queen v. Dudley & Stephens

Description:
Necessity does not justify killing another person who poses no danger. Assize.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Unger cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Unger

Description:
Necessity defense; compulsion; duress; eighth amendment; justification; justification defense. Prisoner may escape to avoid harm if did not cause situation and reasonably believed actions necessary to avoid greater injury than escape.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Hunter cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Hunter

Description:
Compulsion is not a defense to homicide charge unless charge is felony murder. Felony murder rule.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Serravo cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Serravo

Description:
Applying statutory definition of insanity, right and wrong are measured by existing societal standards of morality rather defendant's personal and subjective understanding of illegality of act. Insane; insanity defense; not guilty by reason of insanity.

Select Usage (details) :



Smith v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Smith v. State

Description:
Irresistable impulse test. Person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at time act was committed mental disease or defect caused lack of capacity to appreciate wrongfulness of conduct or conform his conduct to law. Substantial capacity.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Lubow cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Lubow

Description:
Proof of the crime of solicitation is complete upon proof of the communication; it does not require an overt act in furtherance nor does it even require proof of delivery of the solicitation to the intended target; criminal solicitation.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Ochoa cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Ochoa

Description:
Person is an aider and abettor if he shares the criminal intent of the principal and acts in concert with the principal; Abet; accesory; aid and abet; incite; riot.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Etzweiler cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Etzweiler

Description:
Accomplice will be liable only for crimes that he or she intended to facilitate. Negligent homicide.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Verive cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Verive

Description:
Conviction for conspiracy requires an agreement to commit a criminal act and some overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. Corroboration; double jeopardy clause; immunity; perjury.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Diaz cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Diaz

Description:
Participant in a conspiracy is criminally liable for all acts that are done by other members in furtherance of the conspiracy and that are reasonably foreseeable as a necessary consequence of the unlawful agreement.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Christy Pontiac-GMC, Inc. cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Christy Pontiac-GMC, Inc.

Description:
Corporation may be convicted of specific-intent crime when agent of corporation takes illegal acts in furtherance of the corporate business interests; alter ego; commercial crime; corporate crime; legal fiction; specific intent; swindle.

Select Usage (details) :



Commonwealth v. McIlwain School Bus Lines cartoons image illustration picture
Commonwealth v. McIlwain School Bus Lines

Description:
Corporation may be held criminally liable for vehicular homicide when the definition of person in the homicide statute extends beyond that of natural person. Ultra vires.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Hilton Hotel Corp. cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Hilton Hotel Corp.

Description:
Corporation cannot disown the criminal acts of its agents simply by making it company policy not to break the law; to do so would permit a corporate defendant to avoid responsibility for illegal conduct it actually condoned. Sherman antitrust act.

Select Usage (details) :



Commonwealth v. Mitchneck cartoons image illustration picture
Commonwealth v. Mitchneck

Description:
Failing to pay money to a creditor under an agreement to pay the debt of another does not constitute fraudulent conversion, since the money at issue never belonged to the creditor; conversion novation.

Select Usage (details) :



Rex v. Chisser cartoons image illustration picture
Rex v. Chisser

Description:
Taking goods without paying for them is treated as a felony even though the store clerk voluntarily handed the merchandise to the customer for inspection as part of an anticipated transaction. Felleo amimo incohate.

Select Usage (details) :



The King v. Pear cartoons image illustration picture
The King v. Pear

Description:
If one rents property under false pretenses and fails to return it at the end of the lease time, and instead sells the property and keeps the money, he has committed a felony.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Smith cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Smith

Description:
Defendant may not be convicted rape if words and conduct of complainant justify reasonable belief that complainant consented. affirmative defense; general intent; mistake of fact; preponderance of the evidence; reasonable doubt; specific intent.

Select Usage (details) :



In the Interest of M.T.S. cartoons image illustration picture
In the Interest of M.T.S.

Description:
Sexual assault consists of any act of sexual penetration done without the affirmative and freely given permission of the victim. Juvenile delinquency.

Select Usage (details) :



Boro v. People cartoons image illustration picture
Boro v. People

Description:
Consent to an act of sexual intercourse will bar prosecution for rape, even when consent was obtained by fraud, if victim knew that she was consenting to an act of sexual intercourse. Fraud in the factum; fraud in the inducement; prohibition.

Select Usage (details) :



Commonwealth v. Fischer cartoons image illustration picture
Commonwealth v. Fischer

Description:
Reasonable mistake of fact regarding a victim's consent is not a defense to a rape charge. Mens rea.

Select Usage (details) :



State v. Guthrie cartoons image illustration picture
State v. Guthrie

Description:
First Degree Murder; intent to kill must last for more than an instant; murder in the first degree consists of an intentional, deliberate, and premeditated killing, which means that the killing occurs after a period of time of prior consideration.

Select Usage (details) :



Attorney General for Jersey v. Holley cartoons image illustration picture
Attorney General for Jersey v. Holley

Description:
Provocation defense is akin to self defense; would a person having ordinary powers of self-control commit same crime as defendent given gravity of provocation? Evidence of the alcoholism or intoxication of defendant should not be considered.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Howard cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Howard

Description:
Felony murder; accidental death during police chase is not felony muder; but murder can be committed without malice if the killing occurs during the commission of an inherently dangerous felony.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Wilhelm cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Wilhelm

Description:
Rape shield; evidence of victim's sexual conduct with a third party is irrelevant to the issue of whether she consented to sexual intercourse with the defendant; public, provocative displays may or may not be admissible in rape trials.

Select Usage (details) :



Clark v. Arizona cartoons image illustration picture
Clark v. Arizona

Description:
Mott Rule; mental illness short of insanity does not bear on mens rea according to Arizona state Mott Rule; court will not allow evidence of a mental disorder short of insanity as bearing on a defendant's capacity to form specific intent.

Select Usage (details) :



Latimer v. The Queen cartoons image illustration picture
Latimer v. The Queen

Description:
Mercy killing is murder; for defense of necessity to apply, there must be an urgent situation of clear and imminent peril, no reasonable legal alternative to disobeying the law, and proportionality between the harm inflicted and the harm avoided.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Robertson cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Robertson

Description:
Felony murder instruction not proper when underlying felony is integral part of the homicide; shooting to scare off burglars can result in a murder conviction.

Select Usage (details) :



Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt cartoons image illustration picture
Juvenile Court Reasonable Doubt

Description:
In Re Winship, In juvenile court, guilt of criminal charges must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Select Usage (details) :



General Deterrence and Sentencing cartoons image illustration picture
General Deterrence and Sentencing

Description:
United States v. Milken, individual deterrence, general deterrence, punishment, retribution, and rehabilitation, appropriate criminal sentence.

Select Usage (details) :



The Sentencing Reform Act cartoons image illustration picture
The Sentencing Reform Act

Description:
United States v. Gementera, judge force convict to declare crime in public, The Sentencing Reform Act affords courts broad discretion in fashioning conditions of supervised release reasonably related to nature and circumstances of offense.

Select Usage (details) :



Criminal Laws on Homosexuality cartoons image illustration picture
Criminal Laws on Homosexuality

Description:
Lawrence v. Texas, state laws criminalizing homosexual relations violate substantive due process.

Select Usage (details) :



Common Law Misdemeanors cartoons image illustration picture
Common Law Misdemeanors

Description:
Commonwealth v. Mochan, misdemeanors may arise under state common law, acts against the public morality, Lawrence v. Texas, homosexuality.

Select Usage (details) :



Fair Warning In Legislation cartoons image illustration picture
Fair Warning In Legislation

Description:
McBoyle v. United States, legislation must be drafted in such a way as to give citizens fair warning of what conduct is encompassed within the statute, ejusdem generis.

Select Usage (details) :



The Rule of Lenity cartoons image illustration picture
The Rule of Lenity

Description:
United States v. Dauray, The rule of lenity requires that ambiguities in a criminal statute be resolved in the defendant's favor, noscitur a socis.

Select Usage (details) :



Mens Rae cartoons image illustration picture
Mens Rae

Description:
B (A Minor) v. Director of Public Prosecutions, Absent legislative direction, the common law presumes that an accused's honest belief that negates the requisite mens rea of the crime is a valid defense.

Select Usage (details) :



M.C. v. Bulgaria cartoons image illustration picture
M.C. v. Bulgaria

Description:
Essential element of the crime of rape is lack of consent.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Hall cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Hall

Description:
Ski accident, Whether a risk of death is substantial and unjustifiable must be determined based on the circumstances of each case.

Select Usage (details) :



Hines v. State cartoons image illustration picture
Hines v. State

Description:
Felonies that create a foreseeable risk of death under the circumstances are inherently dangerous, justifying the felony-murder rule.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Burton cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Burton

Description:
The underlying felony sufficient to trigger the felony-murder rule must involve an independent felonious purpose, lesser included offense.

Select Usage (details) :



Atkins v. Virginia cartoons image illustration picture
Atkins v. Virginia

Description:
The execution of a mentally retarded person is "cruel and unusual punishment" and therefore violates the Eighth Amendment.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. McDermott cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. McDermott

Description:
A conspiracy requires a unity of unlawful purpose between two or more individuals.

Select Usage (details) :



People v. Goetz cartoons image illustration picture
People v. Goetz

Description:
Self defense, The reasonableness of a belief in the need to use force is determined according to an objective standard, taking into account the circumstances or situation faced by the defendant.

Select Usage (details) :



Clark v. Arizona cartoons image illustration picture
Clark v. Arizona

Description:
Mens rae, under Arizona's Mott rule, a court will not allow evidence of a mental disorder short of insanity as bearing on a defendant's capacity to form specific intent.

Select Usage (details) :



Linda R. S. v. Richard D. cartoons image illustration picture
Linda R. S. v. Richard D.

Description:
A plaintiff must have a sufficient stake in the outcome of a case to maintain standing.

Select Usage (details) :



Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller cartoons image illustration picture
Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller

Description:
Selective prosecution, courts are reluctant to interfere with prosecutorial discretion.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Armstrong cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Armstrong

Description:
In selective-prosecution claims based on race, in order to obtain discovery, the claimant must produce preliminary evidence that similarly situated offenders of a different race could have been prosecuted but were not.

Select Usage (details) :



Brady v. United States cartoons image illustration picture
Brady v. United States

Description:
A guilty plea is not involuntary merely because it was entered into to avoid the possibility of the death penalty.

Select Usage (details) :



Bordenkircher v. Hayes cartoons image illustration picture
Bordenkircher v. Hayes

Description:
It is not a vindictive exercise of a prosecutor's discretion, and therefore not a violation of due process, to reindict a defendant on more serious charges if the defendant does not plead guilty to the original offense charged.

Select Usage (details) :



Williams v. New York cartoons image illustration picture
Williams v. New York

Description:
Pre-sentence investigation, imposition of death sentence for murder in the first degree is not void under the Due Process Clause solely because trial court, before imposing sentence, considered additional information from probation department.

Select Usage (details) :



United States v. Thompson cartoons image illustration picture
United States v. Thompson

Description:
Downward departure, under federal sentencing guidelines, courts may order a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines based on extraordinary family circumstances.

Select Usage (details) :



Blakely v. Washington cartoons image illustration picture
Blakely v. Washington

Description:
Determinate sentence, indeterminate sentence, sentencing guidelines, imposition of a sentence outside the statutory range based on facts never admitted nor put before a jury deprives a criminal defendant of his Sixth Amendment rights.

Select Usage (details) :



Ewing v. California cartoons image illustration picture
Ewing v. California

Description:
Three strikes law, Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, deterrence, proportionality, recidivism, rehabilitation.

Select Usage (details) :



Uses or Carries Firearm in Drug Trafficing Crime cartoons image illustration picture
Uses or Carries Firearm in Drug Trafficing Crime

Description:
Muscarello v. United States; The word "carry," in ordinary sense includes carrying in car neither basic purpose nor legislative history 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) supports circumscribing scope word "carry" by applying "on the person" limitation; lenity.

Select Usage (details) :



Knowingly Commit Each Element of Offense cartoons image illustration picture
Knowingly Commit Each Element of Offense

Description:
Flores-Figueroa v. United States; Courts ordinarily read a phrase in a criminal statute that introduces the elements of a crime with the word "knowingly" as applying that word to each element of the offense; identity theft.

Select Usage (details) :



But-For-Cause of Injury cartoons image illustration picture
But-For-Cause of Injury

Description:
People v. Rideout; For a defendant's conduct to constitute the proximate cause of an injury, the victim's injury must be a direct and natural result of the defendant's actions; but-for-cause.

Select Usage (details) :



Liability For Ownership of Vicious Dogs cartoons image illustration picture
Liability For Ownership of Vicious Dogs

Description:
People v. Knoller; Malice, to satisfy the elements of second-degree murder, requires a defendant's awareness of the risk of death to another; objective; subjective.

Select Usage (details) :



Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide cartoons image illustration picture
Felony in Felony Murder Must Not Be Integral Part Of The Homicide

Description:
People v. Smith; second-degree felony murder conviction cannot stand when in it is based on a felony that is an integral part of the homicide and the evidence produced by the prosecution shows it to be an offense included in fact within homicide.

Select Usage (details) :



Mayberry Instruction Must Have Evidence of Mistaken Belief cartoons image illustration picture
Mayberry Instruction Must Have Evidence of Mistaken Belief

Description:
People v. Williams; trial court must give instruction on mistaken belief to consent to intercourse in rape case only when the defense is supported by substantial evidence sufficient to deserve consideration by jury.

Select Usage (details) :



Evidence of Intoxication Is Admissable Sometimes cartoons image illustration picture
Evidence of Intoxication Is Admissable Sometimes

Description:
United States v. Veach; Intoxication, whether voluntary or involuntary, may preclude the formation of specific intent and thus serve to negate the mens rea element of specific-intent crimes; field sobriety test.

Select Usage (details) :



Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence cartoons image illustration picture
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence

Description:
Perez v. Cain; In a federal habeas proceeding, the standard is whether, after viewing evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

Select Usage (details) :



Accomplice Liability Requires Act, Not Mere Presence cartoons image illustration picture
Accomplice Liability Requires Act, Not Mere Presence

Description:
State v. V.T; Passive behavior, such as mere presence or even continuous presence, absent evidence that the defendant affirmatively did something to instigate, incite, embolden, or help others in committing a crime, is not accomplice liability.

Select Usage (details) :



Withdrawing From Consipiracy Requires Affirmative Act cartoons image illustration picture
Withdrawing From Consipiracy Requires Affirmative Act

Description:
State v. Formella; An individual is criminally liable for the conduct of another when he acts as an accomplice by promoting or facilitating, or by aiding, or agreeing or attempting to aid, another person in planning or committing the offense.

Select Usage (details) :



Mental Illness Evidence Does Not Bear On Mens Rea cartoons image illustration picture
Mental Illness Evidence Does Not Bear On Mens Rea

Description:
Clark v. Arizona; The defendant appealed from his murder conviction, arguing that evidence of his mental illness should have been considered with regard to his ability to form the necessary mens rea.

Select Usage (details) :



Discipline or Child Abuse cartoons image illustration picture
Discipline or Child Abuse

Description:
Willis v. State; parent has fundamental right to direct his or her child's upbringing, which includes the right to use reasonable or moderate physical force to control the child's behavior.

Select Usage (details) :



Taylor Overruled cartoons image illustration picture
Taylor Overruled

Description:
People v. Superior Court; doctrine of "nonmutual collateral estoppe" should not be applied in criminal cases.

Select Usage (details) :



Factors Determining If In Possession of Drugs cartoons image illustration picture
Factors Determining If In Possession of Drugs

Description:
Smith v. State; Several factors, no one of which is conclusive, determine if defendant was "in possession" of drugs: proximity, in plain view, indicia of mutual use and enjoyment, and ownership or possessory interest in location where discovered.

Select Usage (details) :



Involutarily Commit Sexual Predators cartoons image illustration picture
Involutarily Commit Sexual Predators

Description:
Kansas v. Hendricks; Where a civil commitment statute does not seek retribution or deterrence, it does not establish punitive criminal proceedings necessary to uphold double jeopardy and ex post facto claims.

Select Usage (details) :



Felony Murder Rule cartoons image illustration picture
Felony Murder Rule

Description:
People v. Cavitt; The felony-murder rule requires both a causal relationship and a temporal relationship between the underlying felony and the act resulting in death.

Select Usage (details) :



Honest Services Fraud cartoons image illustration picture
Honest Services Fraud

Description:
United States v. Rybicki; To establish honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1346, the evidence must show (1) a scheme or artifice to defraud; (2) for depriving another ofhonest services...; bribery; conflict of interest; kickback; self-dealing behav

Select Usage (details) :



Perjury By Implication Not Allowed cartoons image illustration picture
Perjury By Implication Not Allowed

Description:
Bronston v. United States; To support a perjury conviction, a witness must actually willfully state a material matter that he does not believe to be true.

Select Usage (details) :



Exculpatory-No Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Exculpatory-No Doctrine

Description:
Brogan v. United States; A "false statement" under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 includes any false statement knowingly and willfully made within the jurisdiction of a federal agency, encompassing even a mere false denial of criminal wrongdoing.

Select Usage (details) :



Obstruction Of Justice cartoons image illustration picture
Obstruction Of Justice

Description:
United States v. Aguilar; utterance of false statement to investigating agent—who may or may not testify before a grand jury—does not constitute an endeavor to interfere with the due administration of justice; corruptly; obstruction of justice.

Select Usage (details) :



Attorneys Are Officers Of the Court cartoons image illustration picture
Attorneys Are Officers Of the Court

Description:
United States v. Cueto; Otherwise lawful conduct violates 18 U.S.C. § 1503 if employed with corrupt intent to interfere, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice.

Select Usage (details) :



Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice cartoons image illustration picture
Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice

Description:
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States; One knowingly corruptly persuades another person with intent to cause that person to withhold documents from, or alter documents for use in, an official proceeding only when conscious of wrongdoing.

Select Usage (details) :



Three Strikes cartoons image illustration picture
Three Strikes

Description:
James v. United States; Attempted burglary, as defined by Florida law, is a violent felony under ACCA Armed Career Criminal Act; three strikes.

Select Usage (details) :



Failure to Alleviate Risk cartoons image illustration picture
Failure to Alleviate Risk

Description:
Commonwealth v. Levesque; criminal liability is possible for failure to alleviate risk that the defendant created.

Select Usage (details) :



Juvenile Rehabilitation cartoons image illustration picture
Juvenile Rehabilitation

Description:
Graham v. Florida; convicted juveniles must be give a reasonable chance at rehabilitation.

Select Usage (details) :



Breach of Duty cartoons image illustration picture
Breach of Duty

Description:
Jones v. United States; must establish a duty before breach of duty can support a criminal conviction.

Select Usage (details) :



Viability Standard for Fetus cartoons image illustration picture
Viability Standard for Fetus

Description:
Keeler v. Superior Court; viability of the embryo was not the standard for human being in California in the 1970's.

Select Usage (details) :



Death Penalty for Child Rape cartoons image illustration picture
Death Penalty for Child Rape

Description:
Kennedy v. Louisiana; court says child rape not heinous enough for the death penalty; disproportionate.

Select Usage (details) :



Attempted Murder cartoons image illustration picture
Attempted Murder

Description:
People v. Stone; an attempt to kill anyone is an attempted murder.

Select Usage (details) :



Question of Possession cartoons image illustration picture
Question of Possession

Description:
State v. Barger; new technology complicates questions of possession sufficient to establish criminal liability.

Select Usage (details) :



Withdrawing From Complicity Requires Affirmative Act cartoons image illustration picture
Withdrawing From Complicity Requires Affirmative Act

Description:
State v. Formella; withrawal from consipiracy requires an affirmative act and communication to the other consipirators is helpful.

Select Usage (details) :



Signing With A Fictitious Name cartoons image illustration picture
Signing With A Fictitious Name

Description:
United States v. Moore; signing for an express mail delivery with a fictitious name violates federal law.

Select Usage (details) :



Good Faith Mistake of Fact cartoons image illustration picture
Good Faith Mistake of Fact

Description:
Commonwealth v. Sherry; wheter a reasonable good-faith mistake of fact as to consent is a defense to the crime of rape;

Select Usage (details) :



Reasonable Man Test cartoons image illustration picture
Reasonable Man Test

Description:
Director of Public Prosecutions v. Camplin; the reasonable man standard is a person having the power of self-control to be expected of an ordinary person of the same sex and age as the accused.

Select Usage (details) :



Unjustified Risk Taking cartoons image illustration picture
Unjustified Risk Taking

Description:
People v. Moore; defendant's driving created a sufficiently high probability of death for a second-degree murder conviction; the defendant was subjectively aware of the risk from prior DWI (driving while intoxicated).

Select Usage (details) :



Continuous Conspiracy cartoons image illustration picture
Continuous Conspiracy

Description:
Pinkerton v. United States; When there is a continuous conspiracy, and no evidence of affirmative action to establish withdrawal, as long as the partnership in crime continues, the partners act for each other.

Select Usage (details) :



Defense of Habitation cartoons image illustration picture
Defense of Habitation

Description:
State v. Boyett; entry to home not required for defense of habitation, but habitation defense not applicable if victim was fleeing.

Select Usage (details) :



Substantial Factor Test cartoons image illustration picture
Substantial Factor Test

Description:
Valazquez v. State; but-for test and substantial factor test to determine liability as cause in fact; must also be the proximate cause or no liability.

Select Usage (details) :



Accomplice Liability cartoons image illustration picture
Accomplice Liability

Description:
Commonwealth v. Roebuck; An accomplice is accountable for contributing to criminal conduct to the degree his culpability equals what is required to support liability of a principal actor.

Select Usage (details) :



Second Degree Murder cartoons image illustration picture
Second Degree Murder

Description:
People v. Chun; felony murder; assualtive felony that is inherently dangerous to life; second degree murder; felony murder rule; drive by shooting; accomplice liability.

Select Usage (details) :



Honest Services Fraud Doctrine cartoons image illustration picture
Honest Services Fraud Doctrine

Description:
Skilling v. United States; bribery and kickbacks are honest services fraud, but conflict of interest is not.

Select Usage (details) :



Probation for Corporate Defendants cartoons image illustration picture
Probation for Corporate Defendants

Description:
United States v. Guidant; A term of probation is appropriate for corporate defendants to hold them accountable and serve the public interests.

Select Usage (details) :



Presumptive Sentence cartoons image illustration picture
Presumptive Sentence

Description:
United States v. Deegan; A sentence within the guidelines range is accorded a presumption of reasonableness.

Select Usage (details) :



Sentencing Guideline Range cartoons image illustration picture
Sentencing Guideline Range

Description:
United States v. Bernard Madoff; While the court must give the sentencing guideline range fair and respectful consideration, it is not bound by it and must make an individualized sentencing assessment.

Select Usage (details) :